Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34199108›Full record

ArticleBiology2021

Greater Mouse-Eared Bats (

Justyna Borzęcka, Agata Piecuch, Tomasz Kokurewicz, Kathleen H Lavoie, Rafał Ogórek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Towards evidence-based conservation of subterranean ecosystems.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insight into the Skin Mycobiota ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Fungal systematics and evolution · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of Parabens and Bisphenol A Concentration Levels in Wild Bat Guano Samples.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Justyna BorzęckaDepartment of Mycology and Genetics, University of Wrocław, Przybyszewskiego Street 63-77, 51-148 Wrocław, Poland.
Agata PiecuchDepartment of Mycology and Genetics, University of Wrocław, Przybyszewskiego Street 63-77, 51-148 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7791-8379
Tomasz KokurewiczDepartment of Vertebrate Ecology and Paleontology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Kożuchowska 5b, 51-631 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3906-2124
Kathleen H LavoieDepartment of Biological Sciences, State University of New York, Plattsburgh, NY 12901, USA.
Rafał OgórekDepartment of Mycology and Genetics, University of Wrocław, Przybyszewskiego Street 63-77, 51-148 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0564-7797
University of Wrocław · PLState University of New York · USWrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bats can contribute to an increase of aeromycota in underground ecosystems and might be a vector/reservoir of microorganisms; however, there is no information about the number and species composition of fungi around hibernating bats. One of the most common species in Europe with direct human contact is the greater mouse-eared bat (

Indexed as

aeromycotaair qualityMyotis myotisNietoperek bat reserve

Identifiers

PMID34199108
PMCPMC8301124
OpenAlexW3174965160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.