Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34199023›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Therapeutic Potentials of Ketamine and Esketamine in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Substance Use Disorders (SUD) and Eating Disorders (ED): A Review of the Current Literature.

Giovanni Martinotti, Stefania Chiappini, Mauro Pettorruso, Alessio Mosca, Andrea Miuli, Francesco Di Carlo, Giacomo D'Andrea, Roberta Collevecchio, Ilenia Di Muzio, Stefano L Sensi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni MartinottiDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti-Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7292-2341
Stefania ChiappiniDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti-Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6810-1540
Mauro PettorrusoDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti-Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4164-3040
Alessio MoscaDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti-Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3832-1398
Andrea MiuliDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti-Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2431-0460
Francesco Di CarloDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti-Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8058-3426
Giacomo D'AndreaDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti-Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6808-3960
Roberta CollevecchioDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Ilenia Di MuzioDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti-Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-215X
Stefano L SensiDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Massimo Di GiannantonioDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
University of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The obsessive-compulsive spectrum refers to disorders drawn from several diagnostic categories that share core features related to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), such as obsessive thoughts, compulsive behaviors and anxiety. Disorders that include these features can be grouped according to the focus of the symptoms, e.g., bodily preoccupation (i.e., eating disorders, ED) or impulse control (i.e., substance use disorders, SUD), and they exhibit intriguing similarities in phenomenology, etiology, pathophysiology, patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. The non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAr) antagonist ketamine has been indicated to produce remarkable results in patients with treatment-resistant depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and OCD in dozens of small studies accrued over the past decade, and it appears to be promising in the treatment of SUD and ED. However, despite many small studies, solid evidence for the benefits of its use in the treatment of OCD spectrum and addiction is still lacking. Thus, the aim of this perspective article is to examine the potential for ketamine and esketamine in treating OCD, ED and SUD, which all involve recurring and intrusive thoughts and generate associated compulsive behavior. A comprehensive and updated overview of the literature regarding the pharmacological mechanisms of action of both ketamine and esketamine, as well as their therapeutic advantages over current treatments, are provided in this paper. An electronic search was performed, including all papers published up to April 2021, using the following keywords ("ketamine" or "esketamine") AND ("obsessive" OR "compulsive" OR "OCD" OR "SUD" OR "substance use disorder" OR "addiction" OR "craving" OR "eating" OR "anorexia") NOT review NOT animal NOT "in vitro", on the PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science online databases. The review was conducted in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The use and efficacy of ketamine in SUD, ED and OCD is supported by glutamatergic neurotransmission dysregulation, which plays an important role in these conditions. Ketamine's use is increasing, and preliminary data are optimistic. Further studies are needed in order to better clarify the many unknowns related to the use of both ketamine and esketamine in SUD, ED and OCD, and to understand their long-term effectiveness.

Indexed as

anorexiabulimiaeating disorderesketamineketamineobsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD)S-ketaminesubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID34199023
PMCPMC8301752
OpenAlexW3175732576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.