ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021
Individualized Health Care for Older Diabetes Patients from the Perspective of Health Professionals and Service Consumers.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices in nutrition management for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Kinshasa: a cross-sectional study in Democratic Republic of the Congo.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Precision medicine and personalized nursing in cardiovascular disease: clinical applications and frontier developments.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Individualized Care in The Covid-19 Pandemic: Perceptions of Patients and Nurses.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2025Article
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes-With a Focus on Older Populations: An AI-Assisted Rapid Review of Use and Implementation in Clinical and Organizational Practice.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Influence of institutional support and organisational culture on HIV and NCD integration.Journal of public health in Africa · 2025Article
- Individualized Care in Nursing Homes Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study of the Perception of Individualized Nursing Care Among Nurses in Acute Medical and Perioperative Settings.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Article
- Personalized Nursing and Health Care: Advancing Positive Patient Outcomes in Complex and Multilevel Care Environments.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Patients' Characterization of Medication, Emotions, and Incongruent Perceptions around Adherence.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Uncovering the Imprints of Chronic Disease on Patients' Lives and Self-Perceptions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndividualized nursing care as a form of person-centered care delivery is a well-known approach in the health care context and is accepted as best practice by organizations and professionals, yet its implementation in everyday practice creates serious challenges. The aim was to assess and compare the perceptions of health professionals and older diabetes patients on their individual care in regard to the patient's clinical situation, personal life situation, and decisional control.
methodsThe quantitative study with a cross-sectional survey design was conducted from March 2019 until January 2021. The Individualized Care Scale was applied for the data collection. Health professionals (nurses and physicians,
resultsThe highest-rated aspects of individualized care on both dimensions of the scale from the health professionals' perspective related to the clinical situation, and the scores for provision were significantly higher than those for support. The highest means of patients' ratings on the support dimension related to the clinical situation and the decisions over care sub-scale; for the care provision dimension, the highest individuality in care was assigned to the decisions over care sub-scale. The lowest ratings of individualized care, both in the health professionals' and patients' samples, related to the personal life situation sub-scale.
conclusionsHealth professionals are more positive in regard to individualized care support and provisions for older diabetes patients than the patients themselves. Patient characteristics, such as the type of glucose-lowering therapy, education, and nutritional status, make a difference in patients' understanding and experience of individuality in care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.