Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34198984›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Gene Expression and Carcass Traits Are Different between Different Quality Grade Groups in Red-Faced Hereford Steers.

Bailey Engle, Molly Masters, Jane Ann Boles, Jennifer Thomson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bailey EngleCentre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2360-1012
Molly MastersDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 97071, USA.
Jane Ann BolesDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 97071, USA.
Jennifer ThomsonDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 97071, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1921-0975
Montana State University · USAgriculture and Food · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fat deposition is important to carcass value and some palatability characteristics. Carcasses with higher USDA quality grades produce more value for producers and processors in the US system and are more likely to have greater eating satisfaction. Using genomics to identify genes impacting marbling deposition provides insight into muscle biochemistry that may lead to ways to better predict fat deposition, especially marbling and thus quality grade. Hereford steers (16) were managed the same from birth through harvest after 270 days on feed. Samples were obtained for tenderness and transcriptome profiling. As expected, steaks from Choice carcasses had a lower shear force value than steaks from Select carcasses; however, steaks from Standard carcasses were not different from steaks from Choice carcasses. A significant number of differentially expressed (DE) genes was observed in the longissimus lumborum between Choice and Standard carcass RNA pools (1257 genes,

Indexed as

beef cattlegene expressionquality grade

Identifiers

PMID34198984
PMCPMC8300355
OpenAlexW3173614288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.