Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34198925›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Minimax Rates of

Xin Li, Dongya Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xin LiSchool of Mathematics, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.
Dongya WuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, the high-dimensional linear regression model is considered, where the covariates are measured with additive noise. Different from most of the other methods, which are based on the assumption that the true covariates are fully obtained, results in this paper only require that the corrupted covariate matrix is observed. Then, by the application of information theory, the minimax rates of convergence for estimation are investigated in terms of the ℓp(1≤p<∞)-losses under the general sparsity assumption on the underlying regression parameter and some regularity conditions on the observed covariate matrix. The established lower and upper bounds on minimax risks agree up to constant factors when p=2, which together provide the information-theoretic limits of estimating a sparse vector in the high-dimensional linear errors-in-variables model. An estimator for the underlying parameter is also proposed and shown to be minimax optimal in the ℓ2-loss.

Indexed as

errors-in-variables modelinformation-theoretic limitationsKullback–Leibler divergenceminimax ratesparse linear regression

Identifiers

PMID34198925
PMCPMC8226897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.