Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34198917›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of a Mobile Unit for Remote Cognitive Screening of Isolated Elderly in Rural Areas.

Radia Zeghari, Rachid Guerchouche, Minh Tran Duc, François Bremond, Maria Pascale Lemoine, Vincent Bultingaire, Kai Langel, Zeger De Groote, Francis Kuhn, Emmanuelle Martin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. What Do We Know About Rural Mobile Health Clinics? A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Radia ZeghariCognitive Behavior Technology (CoBTeK) Lab., FRIS-Université Côte d'Azur, 06100 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4089-1675
Rachid GuerchoucheCognitive Behavior Technology (CoBTeK) Lab., FRIS-Université Côte d'Azur, 06100 Nice, France.
Minh Tran DucInstitut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (INRIA), 06902 Valbonne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2571-7871
François BremondCognitive Behavior Technology (CoBTeK) Lab., FRIS-Université Côte d'Azur, 06100 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2988-2142
Maria Pascale LemoineCentre Hospitalier Digne-les-Bains, 04995 Digne-Les-Bains, France.
Vincent BultingaireCentre Hospitalier Digne-les-Bains, 04995 Digne-Les-Bains, France.
Kai LangelJanssen Clinical Innovation, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.
Zeger De GrooteModis, 2550 Kontich, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1060-8450
Francis KuhnFédération d'Aide à Domicile en Milieu Rural (ADMR) des Alpes-de-Hautes-Provences, 04995 Digne-Les-Bains, France.
Emmanuelle MartinFédération d'Aide à Domicile en Milieu Rural (ADMR) des Alpes-de-Hautes-Provences, 04995 Digne-Les-Bains, France.
Philippe RobertCognitive Behavior Technology (CoBTeK) Lab., FRIS-Université Côte d'Azur, 06100 Nice, France.
Alexandra KönigCognitive Behavior Technology (CoBTeK) Lab., FRIS-Université Côte d'Azur, 06100 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9960-9657
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique · FRUniversité Côte d'Azur · FRDienst voor Wetenschappelijke en Technische Informatie · BEJanssen (Belgium) · BE

Funding

EIT Health 19249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the current COVID-19 pandemic situation, now more than ever, remote solutions for assessing and monitoring individuals with cognitive impairment are urgently needed. Older adults in particular, living in isolated rural areas or so-called 'medical deserts', are facing major difficulties in getting access to diagnosis and care. Telemedical approaches to assessments are promising and seem well accepted, reducing the burden of bringing patients to specialized clinics. However, many older adults are not yet adequately equipped to allow for proper implementation of this technology. A potential solution could be a mobile unit in the form of a van, equipped with the telemedical system which comes to the patients' home. The aim of this proof-of-concept study is to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of such mobile unit settings for remote cognitive testing. Methods and analysis: eight participants (aged between 69 and 86 years old) from the city of Digne-Les-Bains volunteered for this study. A basic neuropsychological assessment, including a short clinical interview, is administered in two conditions, by telemedicine in a mobile clinic (equipped van) at a participants' home and face to face in a specialized clinic. The administration procedure order is randomized, and the results are compared with each other. Acceptability and user experience are assessed among participants and clinicians in a qualitative and quantitative manner. Measurements of stress indicators were collected for comparison.

resultsThe analysis revealed no significant differences in test results between the two administration procedures. Participants were, overall, very satisfied with the mobile clinic experience and found the use of the telemedical system relatively easy.

conclusionA mobile unit equipped with a telemedical service could represent a solution for remote cognitive testing overcoming barriers in rural areas to access specialized diagnosis and care.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionFeasibility StudiesHumansMobile Health UnitsPandemicsPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2cognitive assessmentdementiamobile unitscreeningtelemedicinevideoconference

Identifiers

PMID34198917
PMCPMC8201036
OpenAlexW3168471795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.