Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34198885›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Transmission of Vaccination Attitudes and Uptake Based on Social Contagion Theory: A Scoping Review.

Pinelopi Konstantinou, Katerina Georgiou, Navin Kumar, Maria Kyprianidou, Christos Nicolaides, Maria Karekla, Angelos P Kassianos

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Enhancing Mass Vaccination Programs with Queueing Theory and Spatial Optimization.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Pinelopi KonstantinouDepartment of Psychology, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-8079-0417
Katerina GeorgiouDepartment of Psychology, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.
Navin KumarYale Institute for Network Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Maria KyprianidouDepartment of Psychology, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.
Christos NicolaidesDepartment of Business and Public Administration, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-1485-2736
Maria KareklaDepartment of Psychology, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-7021-7908
Angelos P KassianosDepartment of Psychology, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.
University of Cyprus · CYYale University · US

Funding

European Regional Development Fund EXCELLENCE/0918/0115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is a complex health problem, with various factors involved including the influence of an individual's network. According to the Social Contagion Theory, attitudes and behaviours of an individual can be contagious to others in their social networks. This scoping review aims to collate evidence on how attitudes and vaccination uptake are spread within social networks. Databases of PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus were searched with the full text of 24 studies being screened. A narrative synthesis approach was used to collate the evidence and interpret findings. Eleven cross-sectional studies were included. Participants held more positive vaccination attitudes and greater likelihood to get vaccinated or vaccinate their child when they were frequently exposed to positive attitudes and frequently discussing vaccinations with family and friends. We also observed that vaccination uptake was decreased when family and friends were hesitant to take the vaccine. Homophily-the tendency of similar individuals to be connected in a social network-was identified as a significant factor that drives the results, especially with respect to race and ethnicity. This review highlights the key role that social networks play in shaping attitudes and vaccination uptake. Public health authorities should tailor interventions and involve family and friends to result in greater vaccination uptake.

Indexed as

immunizationscoping reviewsocial contagion theorysocial network analysisvaccinationvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID34198885
PMCPMC8229666
OpenAlexW3171099459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.