Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34198844›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

In-Field Automatic Detection of Grape Bunches under a Totally Uncontrolled Environment.

Luca Ghiani, Alberto Sassu, Francesca Palumbo, Luca Mercenaro, Filippo Gambella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca GhianiDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39 a, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4636-8957
Alberto SassuDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39 a, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1010-3495
Francesca PalumboIntelligent System DEsign and Applications (IDEA) Group, Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Via Muroni 23/A, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
Luca MercenaroDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39 a, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
Filippo GambellaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39 a, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7536-3901

Funding

H2020-ECSEL-2018-2-RIA-two-stage 826610Regione Autonoma della Sardegna "Advanced Technologies for LANds management and Tools for Innovative Development of an EcoSustainable agriculture", ATLANTIDE Determinazione n.929 protocollo n. 7610 del 03/11/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An early estimation of the exact number of fruits, flowers, and trees helps farmers to make better decisions on cultivation practices, plant disease prevention, and the size of harvest labor force. The current practice of yield estimation based on manual counting of fruits or flowers by workers is a time consuming and expensive process and it is not feasible for large fields. Automatic yield estimation based on robotic agriculture provides a viable solution in this regard. In a typical image classification process, the task is not only to specify the presence or absence of a given object on a specific location, while counting how many objects are present in the scene. The success of these tasks largely depends on the availability of a large amount of training samples. This paper presents a detector of bunches of one fruit, grape, based on a deep convolutional neural network trained to detect vine bunches directly on the field. Experimental results show a 91% mean Average Precision.

Indexed as

RoboticsVitisFruitHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPlant Diseasesdeep learninggrape detectionobject detectionprecision agricultureprecision viticulture

Identifiers

PMID34198844
PMCPMC8201373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.