ArticleBrain sciences2021
Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment.
Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of patient-reported experience and patient-reported outcome measurement tool for abortion care in Ethiopia: a mixed-method study.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Immersive Virtual Reality Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis: Patient-Reported Experience and Correlates.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- User-centered design and formative evaluation of a gait dashboard for multidimensional walking assessment in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Patient perspectives in neurosurgery: the role of patient-reported experience measures (PREM) in enhancing care quality.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Experiences of People with Multiple Sclerosis in Sensor-Based Jump Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From implementation to discontinuation: multi-year experience with the multiple sclerosis performance test as a digital monitoring tool.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Understanding the Symptoms and Impacts Experienced by People with Relapsing-Remitting MS: A Qualitative Investigation Using Semi-Structured Interviews.Neurology and therapy · 2024Article
- A future of AI-driven personalized care for people with multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Detection of Fall Risk in Multiple Sclerosis by Gait Analysis-An Innovative Approach Using Feature Selection Ensemble and Machine Learning Algorithms.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Balance and Gait in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Machine Learning Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Automated Analysis of the Two-Minute Walk Test in Clinical Practice Using Accelerometer Data.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- An ID-Associated Application to Facilitate Patient-Tailored Management of Multiple Sclerosis.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Using Machine Learning Algorithms for Identifying Gait Parameters Suitable to Evaluate Subtle Changes in Gait in People with Multiple Sclerosis.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWalking assessment (WA) enables meaningful patient mobility assessment. In this context, patient satisfaction with WA can influence assessment compliance and indirectly affect outcomes. One opportunity to assess patient satisfaction is patient-reported and expert-reported experience measures (PREM). Research on PREMs and WA in daily clinical multiple sclerosis (MS) practice does not exist yet.
methodsWe surveyed people with MS about their experience and assessed healthcare professionals' experience via an interview after patients completed WA.
resultsGait parameters were related to perceived difficulty and strain during performance. Less impaired patients perceived the WA to be less difficult and exhausting but were less likely to use WA results for themselves. Men and patients with higher impairment would perform WA more frequently. A good workflow, a fully performed WA with standardized testing, fully functional measurement systems, support and safeguarding by staff in case of falls, direct feedback after the testing, and patients' motivation are identified by the experts as necessary factors for a successful WA.
conclusionsAs patients' experience has an impact on patients' outcomes, long-term monitoring of PREMs should become an integral part of the healthcare service to identify and avoid problems early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.