Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34198698›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Evaluation of a Filtering Facepiece Respirator and a Pleated Particulate Respirator in Filtering Ultrafine Particles and Submicron Particles in Welding and Asphalt Plant Work Environments.

Aniruddha Mitra, Atin Adhikari, Clinton Martin, Gracia Dardano, Pascal Wagemaker, Caleb Adeoye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aniruddha MitraDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8046, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA.
Atin AdhikariJiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8015, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8835-1654
Clinton MartinDepartment of Civil Engineering & Construction Management, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8077, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA.
Gracia DardanoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8046, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA.
Pascal WagemakerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8046, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA.
Caleb AdeoyeJiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8015, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1032-743X
Georgia Southern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manufacturing sites, such as welding, casting, and asphalt production (fumes), generate vast numbers of ultrafine particles of <0.1 µm in size and submicron particles close to the ultrafine range (0.1-0.5 µm). Although cumulative masses of these particles are negligible in comparison to the larger particles, the health effects are more severe due to the higher penetration in the human lower respiratory tract, other body parts crossing the respiratory epithelial layers, and the larger surface area. This research investigates the effectiveness of two common commercially available N95 filtering facepieces and N95 pleated particulate respirator models against ultrafine and submicron particles. Two specific types of respirators, the N95 filtering facepiece and the N95 pleated particulate models, in both sealed and unsealed conditions to the manikin face, were tested at various commercial and academic manufacturing sites, a welding and foundry site, and an asphalt production plant. Two TSI Nanoscan SMPS nanoparticle counters were used simultaneously to collect data for particles of 10-420 nm in size from inside and outside of the respirators. While one of them represented the workplace exposure levels, the other one accounted for the exposure upon filtration through the respiratory surfaces. The results showed the particles generated by these manufacturing operations were mostly within the range of from 40 to 200 nm. Results also indicated that while the percentage of filtration levels varied based on the particle size, it remained mostly within the desired protection level of 95% for both of the N95 respirator models in sealed conditions and even for the N95 pleated particulate model in the unsealed condition. However, in the case of the N95 filtering facepiece model, unsealed respirators showed that the percentage of penetration was very high, decreasing the protection levels to 60% in some cases. Although the number of workplace airborne particle levels varied considerably, the filtration percentages were relatively consistent.

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, OccupationalOccupational ExposureRespiratory Protective DevicesWeldingAerosolsFiltrationHumansHydrocarbonsParticle SizeParticulate MatterVentilators, MechanicalWorkplaceAerosolsAir Pollutants, OccupationalasphaltHydrocarbonsParticulate Matterasphalt plantfiltrationoccupational safetypersonal protective equipmentrespiratorultrafine particlewelding

Identifiers

PMID34198698
PMCPMC8296285
OpenAlexW3166073846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.