Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34198608›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Smart-Contract Aware Ethereum and Client-Fog-Cloud Healthcare System.

Abdullah Lakhan, Mazin Abed Mohammed, Ahmed N Rashid, Seifedine Kadry, Thammarat Panityakul, Karrar Hameed Abdulkareem, Orawit Thinnukool

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mobile health application for Thai women: investigation and model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Blockchain-Cloud Integration: A Survey.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdullah LakhanCollege of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1833-1364
Mazin Abed MohammedCollege of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Anbar, Ramadi 31001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-9030-8102
Ahmed N RashidCollege of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Anbar, Ramadi 31001, Iraq.
Seifedine KadryFaculty of Applied Computing and Technology, Noroff University College, 4608 Kristiansand, Norway.
Thammarat PanityakulDivision of Computational Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
Karrar Hameed AbdulkareemCollege of Agriculture, Al-Muthanna University, Samawah 66001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-7302-2049
Orawit ThinnukoolResearch Group of Embedded Systems and Mobile Application in Health Science, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1664-0059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) is increasingly being used for healthcare purposes. IoMT enables many sensors to collect patient data from various locations and send it to a distributed hospital for further study. IoMT provides patients with a variety of paid programmes to help them keep track of their health problems. However, the current system services are expensive, and offloaded data in the healthcare network are insecure. The research develops a new, cost-effective and stable IoMT framework based on a blockchain-enabled fog cloud. The study aims to reduce the cost of healthcare application services as they are processing in the system. The study devises an IoMT system based on different algorithm techniques, such as Blockchain-Enable Smart-Contract Cost-Efficient Scheduling Algorithm Framework (BECSAF) schemes. Smart-Contract Blockchain schemes ensure data consistency and validation with symmetric cryptography. However, due to the different workflow tasks scheduled on other nodes, the heterogeneous, earliest finish, time-based scheduling deals with execution under their deadlines. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm schemes outperform all existing baseline approaches in terms of the implementation of applications.

Indexed as

BlockchainInternet of ThingsAlgorithmsDelivery of Health CareHumansdistributedethereumprivacyrulessecuritysmart-contract

Identifiers

PMID34198608
PMCPMC8232207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.