Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34198532›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Assessment of the Suitability of Ceramic Waste in Geopolymer Composites: An Appraisal.

Ismail Luhar, Salmabanu Luhar, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah, Marcin Nabiałek, Andrei Victor Sandu, Janusz Szmidla, Anna Jurczyńska, Rafiza Abdul Razak, Ikmal Hakem A Aziz, Noorina Hidayu Jamil and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ismail LuharDepartment of Civil Engineering, Shri Jagdishprasad Jhabarmal Tibrewala University, Rajasthan 333001, India.
Salmabanu LuharFrederick Research Center, P.O. Box 24729, Nicosia 1303, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-1129-2825
Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri AbdullahCenter of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia.
Marcin NabiałekDepartment of Physics, Czestochowa University of Technology, Dabrowskiego 69, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6585-3918
Andrei Victor SanduFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, 71 D. Man-geronBlv., 700050 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9292-749X
Janusz SzmidlaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Częstochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7475-7925
Anna JurczyńskaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Częstochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland.
Rafiza Abdul RazakCenter of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia.
Ikmal Hakem A AzizCenter of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2152-8918
Noorina Hidayu JamilCenter of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia.
Laila Mardiah DeramanCenter of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, novel inorganic alumino-silicate materials, known as geopolymer composites, have emerged swiftly as an ecobenevolent alternative to contemporary ordinary Portland cement (OPC) building materials since they display superior physical and chemical attributes with a diverse range of possible potential applications. The said innovative geopolymer technology necessitates less energy and low carbon footprints as compared to OPC-based materials because of the incorporation of wastes and/or industrial byproducts as binders replacing OPC. The key constituents of ceramic are silica and alumina and, hence, have the potential to be employed as an aggregate to manufacture ceramic geopolymer concrete. The present manuscript presents a review of the performance of geopolymer composites incorporated with ceramic waste, concerning workability, strength, durability, and elevated resistance evaluation.

Indexed as

ceramic powder waste (CPW)ceramic sanitary-wares wastes (CSW)construction and demolition wastes (CDW)geopolymerordinary Portland cement (OPC)porcelain tile polishing residue (PPR)waste clay brick powder (WBP)

Identifiers

PMID34198532
PMCPMC8231838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.