Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34198518›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The Effect of a Total Fishmeal Replacement by

Simon Rosenau, Elisa Oertel, Alexander Charles Mott, Jens Tetens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon RosenauDepartment of Animal Science, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Elisa OertelDepartment of Animal Science, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Alexander Charles MottDepartment of Animal Science, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Jens TetensDepartment of Animal Science, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5352-464X
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

Niedersächsische Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur 11-76251-99-36/16(ZN 3261)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of fishmeal supplements are becoming the focus of aquaculture research, with a special emphasis on microalgae/cyanobacteria such as spirulina being considered as sustainable alternatives. New feed ingredients can have a far-reaching impact on the intestinal microbiome and therefore play an important role in the development and the health of fish. However, the influence of these alternatives on the microbiome is largely unknown. We undertook a 10 weeks feeding experiment on 120 African catfish with an initial body weight of 50.1 ± 2.95 g. To understand the effect of the spirulina supplementation, two isoenergetic experimental diets were formulated, containing either fishmeal or spirulina as a protein source. The 16S rRNA sequencing was used to analyze the intestinal bacteria microbiota. Results show that the observed richness indicated no significant statistical difference, but Chao1, ACE, Shannon, and Simpson indices indicate a possible increase in bacterial richness for the spirulina diet. The most abundant bacteria in both experimental groups were

Indexed as

16S rRNAArthrospira platensisbacteriaClarias gariepinuscyanobacteriamicroalgaemicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID34198518
PMCPMC8231832
OpenAlexW3166991371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.