ArticleJournal of biomechanics2021
Effects of chondrogenic priming duration on mechanoregulation of engineered cartilage.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanically graded granular scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering.Biomaterials advances · 2026Article
- Role of YAP/TAZ Mechanobiological Signaling in Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis.Calcified tissue international · 2026Review
- Mechanobiology-based strategies for the maturation of biofabricated cartilage constructs.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Chondrogenic Maturation Governs hMSC Mechanoresponsiveness to Dynamic Compression.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Considerations and implications of currentFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Advancements in hydrogel design for articular cartilage regeneration: A comprehensive review.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Periodic static compression of micro-strain pattern regulates endochondral bone formation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Stirred culture of cartilaginous microtissues promotes chondrogenic hypertrophy through exposure to intermittent shear stress.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Article
- Progress in biomechanical stimuli on the cell-encapsulated hydrogels for cartilage tissue regeneration.Biomaterials research · 2023Review
- Double-edged role of mechanical stimuli and underlying mechanisms in cartilage tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- NFκB inhibition to lift the mechano-competence of mesenchymal stromal cell-derived neocartilage toward articular chondrocyte levels.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Article
- Single-Cell Integration Analysis of Heterotopic Ossification and Fibrocartilage Developmental Lineage: Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Effector Xbp1 Transcriptionally Regulates the Notch Signaling Pathway to Mediate Fibrocartilage Differentiation.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Chondrocyte maturation during cartilage development occurs under diverse and dynamic mechanical environments. Mechanical stimulation through bioreactor culture may mimic these conditions to direct cartilage tissue engineering in vitro. Mechanical cues can promote chondrocyte homeostasis or hypertrophy and mineralization, depending potentially on the timing of load application. Here, we tested the effects of chondrogenic priming duration on the response of engineered human cartilage constructs to dynamic mechanical compression. We cultured human bone marrow stromal cells (hMSCs) in fibrin hydrogels under chondrogenic priming conditions for periods of 0, 2, 4, or 6 weeks prior to two weeks of either static culture or dynamic compression. We measured construct mechanical properties, cartilage matrix composition, and gene expression. Dynamic compression increased the equilibrium and dynamic modulus of the engineered tissue, depending on the duration of chondrogenic priming. For priming times of 2 weeks or greater, dynamic compression enhanced COL2A1 and AGGRECAN mRNA expression at the end of the loading period, but did not alter total collagen or glycosaminoglycan matrix deposition. Load initiation at priming times of 4 weeks or less repressed transient osteogenic signaling (RUNX2, OPN) and expression of CYR61, a YAP/TAZ-TEAD-target gene. No suppression of osteogenic gene expression was observed if loading was initiated after 6 weeks of in vitro priming, when mechanical stimulation was observed to increase the expression of type X collagen. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the duration of in vitro chondrogenic priming regulates the cell response to dynamic mechanical compression and suggests that early loading may preserve chondrocyte homeostasis while delayed loading may support cartilage maturation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.