Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34197933›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2021

Specialist training in medical microbiology across Europe in 2021-an update on the actual training situation based on a survey.

Maeve Doyle, Breida Boyle, Caoimhe Brennan, Jane Holland, Albert Mifsud, Markus Hell, Frank van Tiel, Truls Michael Leegaard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maeve DoyleDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Waterford, Ireland. Electronic address: MaeveM.Doyle@hse.ie.
Breida BoyleDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, St James Hospital Dublin, Ireland.
Caoimhe BrennanDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Waterford, Ireland.
Jane HollandDepartment of Anatomy, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Albert MifsudDepartment of Microbiology, Whipps Cross Hospital, London, UK.
Markus HellDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Control, MEDILAB-Academic Teaching Laboratories, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Frank van TielDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Truls Michael LeegaardDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway; Division of Medicine and Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importance of defining and establishing professional standards for Clinical Microbiology (CM) in Europe has long been highlighted, starting with the development of a European curriculum. The first European Curriculum in Medical Microbiology (MM) was adopted by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) council in 2017.

objectivesThis paper assesses how training programmes in CM in Europe align with the European curriculum, just under 5 years after its introduction, and reviews what methods of assessment are in use to assess the CM trainees' progress during training programmes. SOURCES: Using an internet-based platform, a questionnaire was circulated to the full, associate and observer members of the UEMS MM section. Information collected related to the structure, content and delivery of CM training in the participating countries, as well as methods of assessment used to evaluate training progress. CONTENT: Twenty-one countries responded, from a total of 30 countries invited to participate. All had a structured CM training programme, with a curriculum, dedicated trainers and a record of training activities. Fifteen countries require trainees to pass an exit examination, and over 60% of countries participate in continuous workplace-based assessment. Of the participating countries, 57% meet the European Training Requirements recommendation that duration of specialist training is 60 months. Regarding core competencies, all trainees gain experience in laboratory skills and infection prevention and control, but the emphasis on clinical management and antimicrobial stewardship is more varied across countries. IMPLICATIONS: The UEMS MM curriculum has been largely adopted by 21 countries within less than 5 years of ratification, which speaks optimistically to a future of standardized quality training across Europe. The introduction of a pilot European Examination in Clinical Microbiology in 2021 is the start of a pan-European assessment of the success of the implementation of this curriculum and the first step in quality assurance for CM training in Europe.

Indexed as

CurriculumSpecializationClinical CompetenceEuropeEuropean UnionHumansInfectious Disease MedicineMicrobiologySurveys and QuestionnairesCurriculumEuropean curriculum in medical microbiologyEuropean union of medical specialistsMicrobiologyPostgraduate training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.