Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34197807›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

Regulation of epithelial sodium channel activity by SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 proteins.

Stephen N Grant, Henry A Lester

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Epithelial NaComprehensive Physiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. An experimental test of the nicotinic hypothesis of COVID-19.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen N GrantDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Pasadena, California.
Henry A LesterDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California. Electronic address: lester@caltech.edu.
California Institute of Technology · USDivision of Chemistry · US

Funding

Fluorescent biosensors for subcellular pharmacokineticsR01GM123582 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LESTER, HENRY A. · 2016 to 2021
$3.8M
Opioids inside OrganellesR21DA049140 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LESTER, HENRY A. · 2019 to 2020
$452k
Molecular dissection of acute and chronic menthol interactionsF31DA046122 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GRANT, STEPHEN NICHOLAS · 2019 to 2021
$119k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA046122NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA049140NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV) 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes the coronavirus disease 2019, encodes several proteins whose roles are poorly understood. We tested their ability either to directly form plasma membrane ion channels or to change functions of two mammalian plasma membrane ion channels, the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) and the α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. In mRNA-injected Xenopus oocytes, none of nine SARS-CoV-2 proteins or two SARS-CoV-1 proteins produced conductances, nor did co-injection of several combinations. Immunoblots for ORF8, spike (S), and envelope (E) proteins revealed that the proteins are expressed at appropriate molecular weights. In experiments on coexpression with ENaC, three tested SARS proteins (SARS-CoV-1 E, SARS-CoV-2 E, and SARS-CoV-2 S) markedly decrease ENaC currents. SARS-CoV-1 S protein decreases ENaC currents modestly. Coexpressing the E proteins but not the S proteins with α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors significantly reduces acetylcholine-induced currents. ENaC inhibition does not occur if the SARS-CoV protein mRNAs are injected 24 h after the ENaC mRNAs, suggesting that SARS-CoV proteins affect early step(s) in functional expression of channel proteins. Consistent with the hypothesis that the SARS-CoV-2 S protein-induced ENaC inhibition involves competition for available protease, mutating the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 S protein partially relieves inhibition of ENaC currents. Extending previous suggestions that SARS proteins affect ENaC currents via protein kinase C (PKC) activation, PKC activation via phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate decreases ENaC and α3β4 activity. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate application reduced membrane capacitance ∼5%, presumably via increased endocytosis, but this decrease is much smaller than the SARS proteins' effects on conductances. Also, incubating oocytes in Gö-6976, a PKCα and PKCβ inhibitor, did not alter E or S protein-induced channel inhibition. We conclude that SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 proteins alter the function of human plasma membrane channels, via incompletely understood mechanisms. These interactions may play a role in the coronavirus 2019 pathophysiology.

Indexed as

COVID-19Epithelial Sodium ChannelsAnimalsHumansOocytesSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusXenopus laevisEpithelial Sodium ChannelsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34197807
PMCPMC8238646
OpenAlexW3173452947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.