Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34197772›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. HIV2021

Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Onyema Ogbuagu, Peter J Ruane, Daniel Podzamczer, Laura C Salazar, Keith Henry, David M Asmuth, David Wohl, Richard Gilson, Yongwu Shao, Ramin Ebrahimi and 11 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. HIV, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02842086 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Alafenamide), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02842086 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Alafenamide (F/TAF) Fixed-Dose Combination Once Daily for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex With Men and Are At Risk of HIV-1 Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorGilead SciencesRan2016 to 2026Enrolled5,399ConditionsPre-Exposure Prophylaxis of HIV-1 InfectionArmsF/TAF, F/TDF, F/TAF Placebo, F/TDF Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Canadian guideline on HIV pre- and postexposure prophylaxis: 2025 update.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Bone Changes With Long-Acting Cabotegravir or Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine for HIV Prevention in Cisgender Men and Transgender Women: HPTN 083.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Onyema OgbuaguSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: onyema.ogbuagu@yale.edu.
Peter J RuaneRuane Clinical Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Daniel PodzamczerHIV and STI Unit, Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura C SalazarHoag Medical Group, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
Keith HenryHennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
David M AsmuthSchool of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
David WohlDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Richard GilsonCentre for Clinical Research in Infection and Sexual Health, University College London, London, UK.
Yongwu ShaoDepartments of Biometrics, Virology, and Clinical Research, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Ramin EbrahimiDepartments of Biometrics, Virology, and Clinical Research, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Stephanie CoxDepartments of Biometrics, Virology, and Clinical Research, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Alexander KintuDepartments of Biometrics, Virology, and Clinical Research, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Christoph CarterDepartments of Biometrics, Virology, and Clinical Research, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Moupali DasDepartments of Biometrics, Virology, and Clinical Research, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Jared M BaetenDepartments of Biometrics, Virology, and Clinical Research, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Diana M BrainardDepartments of Biometrics, Virology, and Clinical Research, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Gary WhitlockChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jason M BrunettaMaple Leaf Medical Clinic, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gitte KronborgDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark.
Christoph D SpinnerTechnical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
DISCOVER study team
Gilead Sciences (United States) · USMaple Leaf Medical Clinic · CAChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBRuane Medical · USUniversity College London · GBBellvitge University Hospital · ESHennepin Healthcare Research Institute · USHoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · USTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USYale University · US

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn DISCOVER, a multinational, randomised controlled trial, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide compared with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate showed non-inferior efficacy for HIV prevention and improved bone mineral density and renal safety biomarkers at week 48. We report outcomes analysed after all participants had completed 96 weeks of follow-up.

methodsThis study is an ongoing, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done at 94 community, public health, and hospital-associated clinics located in Europe and North America. Adult cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men, both with a high risk of acquiring HIV as determined by self-reported sexual behaviour or recent sexually transmitted infections, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (200/25 mg) tablets daily, with matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide group), or emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (200/300 mg) tablets daily, with matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group). The primary efficacy outcome was incident HIV infection. Incidence of HIV-1 infection per 100 person-years was assessed when the last participant had completed 96 weeks of follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02842086.

findingsBetween Sept 13, 2016, and June 30, 2017, 5387 participants were randomly assigned to receive emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (n=2694) or emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (n=2693), contributing 10 081 person-years of follow-up. At 96 weeks of follow-up, there were eight HIV infections in participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (0·16 infections per 100 person-years [95% CI 0·07-0·31]) and 15 in participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (0·30 infections per 100 person-years [0·17-0·49]). Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide maintained its non-inferiority to emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV prevention (IRR 0·54 [95% CI 0·23-1·26]). Approximately 78-82% of participants reported taking study medication more than 95% of the time across all study visits. Rates of sexually transmitted infections remained high and similar across groups (21 cases per 100 person-years for rectal gonorrhoea and 28 cases per 100 person-years for rectal chlamydia). Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide continued to show superiority over emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in all but one of the six prespecified bone mineral density and renal biomarkers. There was more weight gain among participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (median weight gain 1·7 kg vs 0·5 kg, p<0·0001).

interpretationEmtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide is safe and effective for longer-term pre-exposure prophylaxis in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men.

fundingGilead Sciences.

Indexed as

AdenineAdultAgedAlanineAnti-HIV AgentsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEmtricitabineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrganophosphonatesAdenineAlanineAnti-HIV AgentsEmtricitabineOrganophosphonatesTenofovirtenofovir alafenamide

Identifiers

PMID34197772
PMCPMC12492902
OpenAlexW3175868284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.