Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34197764›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2021

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy children and adolescents: a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial.

Bihua Han, Yufei Song, Changgui Li, Wanqi Yang, Qingxia Ma, Zhiwei Jiang, Minjie Li, Xiaojuan Lian, Wenbin Jiao, Lei Wang and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 206 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
22.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04551547 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ Clinical Trial, to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Inactivated Vaccine (Vero Cell) in Healthy Population Aged 3-17 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorSinovac Research and Development Co., Ltd.Ran2020 to 2023Enrolled552ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsTwo doses of low dosage inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the schedule of day 0,28, Two doses of medium dosage inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the schedule of day 0,28, Two doses of placebo at the schedule of day 0,28
NCT06282692 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

An Open Label, Phase III Clinical Trial (Immunobridging Study) of INAVAC (Vaksin Merah Putih - UA-SARS CoV-2 (Vero Cell Inactivated)) in Healthy Population Aged 12 to 17 Years Old

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr. Soetomo General HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled400ConditionsCOVID-19 Pandemic, COVID-19 VaccinesArmsINAVAC (Vaksin Merah Putih - UA-SARS CoV-2 (Vero Cell Inactivated) 5 µg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 352 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bihua HanHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Yufei SongSinovac Biotech, Beijing, China.
Changgui LiNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Wanqi YangSinovac Biotech, Beijing, China.
Qingxia MaZanhuang County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zanhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Zhiwei JiangBeijing Key Tech Statistics Technology, Beijing, China.
Minjie LiHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Xiaojuan LianSinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wenbin JiaoZanhuang County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zanhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Lei WangSinovac Biotech, Beijing, China.
Qun ShuBeijing Key Tech Statistics Technology, Beijing, China.
Zhiwei WuHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Yuliang ZhaoHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Qi LiHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China. Electronic address: liqicdc226@163.com.
Qiang GaoSinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: gaoq@sinovac.com.
Hebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSinovac Biotech · CNNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 for children and adolescents will play an important role in curbing the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a candidate COVID-19 vaccine, CoronaVac, containing inactivated SARS-CoV-2, in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years.

methodsWe did a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial of CoronaVac in healthy children and adolescents aged 3-17 years old at Hebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Zanhuang (Hebei, China). Individuals with SARS-CoV-2 exposure or infection history were excluded. Vaccine (in 0·5 mL aluminum hydroxide adjuvant) or aluminum hydroxide only (alum only, control) was given by intramuscular injection in two doses (day 0 and day 28). We did a phase 1 trial in 72 participants with an age de-escalation in three groups and dose-escalation in two blocks (1·5 μg or 3·0 μg per injection). Within each block, participants were randomly assigned (3:1) by means of block randomisation to receive CoronaVac or alum only. In phase 2, participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) by means of block randomisation to receive either CoronaVac at 1·5 μg or 3·0 μg per dose, or alum only. All participants, investigators, and laboratory staff were masked to group allocation. The primary safety endpoint was adverse reactions within 28 days after each injection in all participants who received at least one dose. The primary immunogenicity endpoint assessed in the per-protocol population was seroconversion rate of neutralising antibody to live SARS-CoV-2 at 28 days after the second injection. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04551547.

findingsBetween Oct 31, 2020, and Dec 2, 2020, 72 participants were enrolled in phase 1, and between Dec 12, 2020, and Dec 30, 2020, 480 participants were enrolled in phase 2. 550 participants received at least one dose of vaccine or alum only (n=71 for phase 1 and n=479 for phase 2; safety population). In the combined safety profile of phase 1 and phase 2, any adverse reactions within 28 days after injection occurred in 56 (26%) of 219 participants in the 1·5 μg group, 63 (29%) of 217 in the 3·0 μg group, and 27 (24%) of 114 in the alum-only group, without significant difference (p=0·55). Most adverse reactions were mild and moderate in severity. Injection site pain was the most frequently reported event (73 [13%] of 550 participants), occurring in 36 (16%) of 219 participants in the 1·5 μg group, 35 (16%) of 217 in the 3·0 μg group, and two (2%) in the alum-only group. As of June 12, 2021, only one serious adverse event of pneumonia has been reported in the alum-only group, which was considered unrelated to vaccination. In phase 1, seroconversion of neutralising antibody after the second dose was observed in 27 of 27 participants (100·0% [95% CI 87·2-100·0]) in the 1·5 μg group and 26 of 26 participants (100·0% [86·8-100·0]) in the 3·0 μg group, with the geometric mean titres of 55·0 (95% CI 38·9-77·9) and 117·4 (87·8-157·0). In phase 2, seroconversion was seen in 180 of 186 participants (96·8% [93·1-98·8]) in the 1·5 μg group and 180 of 180 participants (100·0% [98·0-100·0]) in the 3·0 μg group, with the geometric mean titres of 86·4 (73·9-101·0) and 142·2 (124·7-162·1). There were no detectable antibody responses in the alum-only groups.

interpretationCoronaVac was well tolerated and safe and induced humoral responses in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years. Neutralising antibody titres induced by the 3·0 μg dose were higher than those of the 1·5 μg dose. The results support the use of 3·0 μg dose with a two-immunisation schedule for further studies in children and adolescents.

fundingThe Chinese National Key Research and Development Program and the Beijing Science and Technology Program.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdolescentAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralChildChild, PreschoolChinaCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansImmunizationImmunogenicity, VaccineInjections, IntramuscularAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesSARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID34197764
PMCPMC8238449
OpenAlexW3173690790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.