Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34197503›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A transfer learning approach to facilitate ComBat-based harmonization of multicentre radiomic features in new datasets.

Ronrick Da-Ano, François Lucia, Ingrid Masson, Ronan Abgral, Joanne Alfieri, Caroline Rousseau, Augustin Mervoyer, Caroline Reinhold, Olivier Pradier, Ulrike Schick and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Long-axial field-of-view PET/CT improves radiomics feature reliability.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ronrick Da-AnoINSERM, UMR 1101, LaTIM, University of Brest, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5730-4211
François LuciaINSERM, UMR 1101, LaTIM, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Ingrid MassonINSERM, UMR 1101, LaTIM, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Ronan AbgralDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Joanne AlfieriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec.
Caroline RousseauDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France.
Augustin MervoyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France.
Caroline ReinholdDepartment of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Olivier PradierINSERM, UMR 1101, LaTIM, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Ulrike SchickINSERM, UMR 1101, LaTIM, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Dimitris VisvikisINSERM, UMR 1101, LaTIM, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Mathieu HattINSERM, UMR 1101, LaTIM, University of Brest, Brest, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo facilitate the demonstration of the prognostic value of radiomics, multicenter radiomics studies are needed. Pooling radiomic features of such data in a statistical analysis is however challenging, as they are sensitive to the variability in scanner models, acquisition protocols and reconstruction settings, which is often unavoidable in a multicentre retrospective analysis. A statistical harmonization strategy called ComBat was utilized in radiomics studies to deal with the "center-effect". The goal of the present work was to integrate a transfer learning (TL) technique within ComBat-and recently developed alternate versions of ComBat with improved flexibility (M-ComBat) and robustness (B-ComBat)-to allow the use of a previously determined harmonization transform to the radiomic feature values of new patients from an already known center. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe proposed TL approach were incorporated in the four versions of ComBat (standard, B, M, and B-M ComBat). The proposed approach was evaluated using a dataset of 189 locally advanced cervical cancer patients from 3 centers, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) images, with the clinical endpoint of predicting local failure. The impact performance of the TL approach was evaluated by comparing the harmonization achieved using only parts of the data to the reference (harmonization achieved using all the available data). It was performed through three different machine learning pipelines.

resultsThe proposed TL technique was successful in harmonizing features of new patients from a known center in all versions of ComBat, leading to predictive models reaching similar performance as the ones developed using the features harmonized with all the data available.

conclusionThe proposed TL approach enables applying a previously determined ComBat transform to new, previously unseen data.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCervix UteriChemoradiotherapyDatasets as TopicDecision Support Systems, ClinicalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34197503
PMCPMC8248970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.