Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34197488›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Acute myocardial infarction: Development and application of an ICD-10-CM-based algorithm to a large U.S. healthcare claims-based database.

Patrick Saunders-Hastings, Sze Wing Heong, Jenny Srichaikul, Hui-Lee Wong, Azadeh Shoaibi, Kinnera Chada, Timothy A Burrell, Graça M Dores

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. circRNA-79530 regulates Twist-mediated mitochondrial damageEuropean journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick Saunders-HastingsGevity Consulting Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9623-0243
Sze Wing HeongGevity Consulting Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jenny SrichaikulGevity Consulting Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Hui-Lee WongCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Azadeh ShoaibiCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Kinnera ChadaCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Timothy A BurrellIBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Graça M DoresCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research · USIBM (United States) · US

Funding

FDA HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare administrative claims data hold value for monitoring drug safety and assessing drug effectiveness. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration Biologics Effectiveness and Safety Initiative (BEST) is expanding its analytical capacity by developing claims-based definitions-referred to as algorithms-for populations and outcomes of interest. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was of interest due to its potential association with select biologics and the lack of an externally validated International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) algorithm.

objectiveDevelop and apply an ICD-10-CM-based algorithm in a U.S. administrative claims database to identify and characterize AMI populations.

methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify validated AMI algorithms. Building on prior published methodology and consistent application of ICD-9-CM codes, an ICD-10-CM algorithm was developed via forward-backward mapping using General Equivalence Mappings and refined with clinical input. An AMI population was then identified in the IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases and characterized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Between 2014-2017, 2.83-3.16 individuals/1,000 enrollees/year received ≥1 AMI diagnosis in any healthcare setting. The 2015 transition to ICD-10-CM did not result in a substantial change in the proportion of patients identified. Average patient age at first AMI diagnosis was 64.9 years, and 61.4% of individuals were male. Unspecified chest pain, hypertension, and coronary atherosclerosis of native coronary vessel/artery were most commonly reported within one day of AMI diagnosis. Electrocardiograms were the most common medical procedure and beta-blockers were the most commonly ordered cardiac medication in the one day before to 14 days following AMI diagnosis. The mean length of inpatient stay was 5.6 days (median 3 days; standard deviation 7.9 days). Findings from this ICD-10-CM-based AMI study were internally consistent with ICD-9-CM-based findings and externally consistent with ICD-9-CM-based studies, suggesting that this algorithm is ready for validation in future studies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdministrative Claims, HealthcareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiological ProductsDatabases, FactualData Interpretation, StatisticalElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID34197488
PMCPMC8248590
OpenAlexW3174112633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.