Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34197180›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2021

Toward a New Strategic Public Health Science for Policy, Practice, Impact, and Health Equity.

Rebecca Bunnell, Juliet Ryan, Charlotte Kent, CDC Office of Science and CDC Excellence in Science Committee

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Principles of Health Equity Science for Public Health Action.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca BunnellRebecca Bunnell and Juliet Ryan are with the Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Charlotte Kent is with Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC. Note. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC or the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
Juliet RyanRebecca Bunnell and Juliet Ryan are with the Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Charlotte Kent is with Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC. Note. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC or the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
Charlotte KentRebecca Bunnell and Juliet Ryan are with the Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Charlotte Kent is with Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC. Note. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC or the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
CDC Office of Science and CDC Excellence in Science CommitteeRebecca Bunnell and Juliet Ryan are with the Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Charlotte Kent is with Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC. Note. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC or the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and its social and health impact have underscored the need for a new strategic science agenda for public health. To optimize public health impact, high-quality strategic science addresses scientific gaps that inform policy and guide practice. At least 6 scientific gaps emerge from the US experience with COVID-19: health equity science, data science and modernization, communication science, policy analysis and translation, scientific collaboration, and climate science. Addressing these areas within a strategic public health science agenda will accelerate achievement of public health goals. Public health leadership and scientists have an unprecedented opportunity to use strategic science to guide a new era of improved and equitable public health.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health EquityHealth PlanningHealth PolicyHumansPublic HealthSocial Determinants of HealthUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34197180
PMCPMC8489640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.