Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34197028›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2021

Structural brain dynamics across reading development: A longitudinal MRI study from kindergarten to grade 5.

Thanh Van Phan, Diana Sima, Dirk Smeets, Pol Ghesquière, Jan Wouters, Maaike Vandermosten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Socioeconomic status and reading outcomes: Neurobiological and behavioral correlates.New directions for child and adolescent development · 2022
    Review
  13. Beyond Statistics.Soa--ch'ongsonyon chongsin uihak = Journal of child & adolescent psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thanh Van Phanicometrix, Research and Development, Leuven, Belgium.
Diana Simaicometrix, Research and Development, Leuven, Belgium.
Dirk Smeetsicometrix, Research and Development, Leuven, Belgium.
Pol GhesquièreParenting and Special Education, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jan WoutersExperimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Department Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Maaike VandermostenExperimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Department Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9928-1580
Icometrix (Belgium) · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary education is the incubator for learning academic skills that help children to become a literate, communicative, and independent person. Over this learning period, nonlinear and regional changes in the brain occur, but how these changes relate to academic performance, such as reading ability, is still unclear. In the current study, we analyzed longitudinal T1 MRI data of 41 children in order to investigate typical cortical development during the early reading stage (end of kindergarten-end of grade 2) and advanced reading stage (end of grade 2-middle of grade 5), and to detect putative deviant trajectories in children with dyslexia. The structural brain change was quantified with a reliable measure that directly calculates the local morphological differences between brain images of two time points, while considering the global head growth. When applying this measure to investigate typical cortical development, we observed that left temporal and temporoparietal regions belonging to the reading network exhibited an increase during the early reading stage and stabilized during the advanced reading stage. This suggests that the natural plasticity window for reading is within the first years of primary school, hence earlier than the typical period for reading intervention. Concerning neurotrajectories in children with dyslexia compared to typical readers, we observed no differences in gray matter development of the left reading network, but we found different neurotrajectories in right IFG opercularis (during the early reading stage) and in right isthmus cingulate (during the advanced reading stage), which could reflect compensatory neural mechanisms.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexChild DevelopmentDyslexiaNerve NetNeuroimagingReadingChildChild, PreschoolHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalebrainchildhoodcortical developmentdyslexialongitudinalMRIprimary schoolreading

Identifiers

PMID34197028
PMCPMC8410537
OpenAlexW3173591001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.