ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2021
Critical analysis of pyeloplasty role in adults with late diagnosis of ureteropelvic junction obstruction-a comparative study.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in older patients.World journal of urology · 2025Observational
- Surgical intervention and long-term renal outcomes of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a young adult cohort.International urology and nephrology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDue to the data paucity about the functional outcomes post pyeloplasty for patients diagnosed with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with a preoperative age above the age of 45 years and according to the elderly definition (age ≥ 65 years), we conducted this study to clarify the different outcomes in adults presented with late hydronephrosis.
methodsWe included patients who were managed by pyeloplasty with a preoperative age ≥ 45 years. We further subdivided those patients into; group (A) patient's age ≥ 65 years and group (B) patient's age ≥ 45 and < 65 years. Split renal function (SRF) difference was evaluated by the changes between the last follow-up and the baseline renogram, where 5% change was considered a significant change. Functional outcomes and factors predicting the functional recoverability post pyeloplasty were evaluated.
resultsA total of 119 patients were included. The mean age was 62.3 ± 16.4 years. Group (A) and group (B) included 47 and 72 patients, respectively. After 24 months, GFR and SRF were increased at the last follow-up (P = 0.32 and 0.57, respectively). No significant functional changes were noted between both groups. Sixty two, 7 and 13 patients showed static, decreased and improved renal function. Lower preoperative SRF was the only predictor for poor functional recoverability in patients with age ≥ 45 years who were managed by pyeloplasty.
conclusionElderly patients should not be excluded from the corrective surgery for UPJO. Lower preoperative SRF was the only predictor for renal function deterioration post pyeloplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.