Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196875›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2021

[Make nursing practice visible through nursing science in times of COVID-19].

Manuela Hödl, Silvia Bauer, Doris Eglseer, Martin Fangmeyer, Magdalena Flatscher-Thöni, Jan Kellerer, Christiane Kreyer, Gerhard Müller, Martin Pallauf, Matthias Rohringer and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [COVID-19 protective measures in nursing homes: Between autonomy and care - Results of an interview study].Ethik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manuela HödlInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft, Medizinische Universität Graz, Universitätsplatz 4, 8010, Graz, Österreich. manuela.hoedl@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9829-2766
Silvia BauerInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft, Medizinische Universität Graz, Universitätsplatz 4, 8010, Graz, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3058-8728
Doris EglseerInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft, Medizinische Universität Graz, Universitätsplatz 4, 8010, Graz, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9739-7555
Martin FangmeyerDepartment für Evidenzbasierte Medizin und Evaluation, Zentrum Cochrane Österreich, Donau-Universität Krems, Krems, Österreich.
Magdalena Flatscher-ThöniInstitut für Public Health, Medical Decision Making und HTA, UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Hall in Tirol, Österreich.
Jan KellererInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft, UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Hall in Tirol, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8276-923X
Christiane KreyerInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft, UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Hall in Tirol, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-5631
Gerhard MüllerInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft, UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Hall in Tirol, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9077-6344
Martin PallaufInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft, UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Hall in Tirol, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1363-0848
Matthias RohringerInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft, UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Hall in Tirol, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-0032
Ana ToromanovaDepartment für Evidenzbasierte Medizin und Evaluation, Zentrum Cochrane Österreich, Donau-Universität Krems, Krems, Österreich.
Daniela SchobererInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft, Medizinische Universität Graz, Universitätsplatz 4, 8010, Graz, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9831-0570
UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik · ATUniversity of Graz · ATUniversität für Weiterbildung Krems · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) nursing practice is facing enormous challenges. Nevertheless, nursing science was hardly actively represented as a mouthpiece for the practice in the public discussions on the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the question arises which projects with a focus on nursing and COVID-19 have been carried out at Austrian universities. Overall, six projects were identified using the snowball method. Of the studies one showed that an increased wearing time of masks is associated with an increased stress level for nursing personnel. An additional study result showed that almost 50% of lay people used masks incorrectly. Individual experiences, interventions undertaken and solution approaches from the perspective of the nursing staff with respect to ethical challenges in nursing homes were collected in a further project. This and other projects show that nursing science, with its knowledge and as a voice for nursing practice, has taken the initiative and contributes to the COVID-19 discourse. Additionally, the findings of the projects can be used as a basis for making future political decisions.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsDecision MakingHumansNursing HomesSARS-CoV-2AustriaCOVID-19Nursing care

Identifiers

PMID34196875
PMCPMC8246423
OpenAlexW3174697021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.