ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2021
Monogenic and Polygenic Models of Coronary Artery Disease.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06362278 (A Multi-omics Study of Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease in the Absence of Common Risk Factors), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-omics Study of Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease in the Absence of Common Risk Factors
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Polygenic Scores and CT Imaging in Risk Factor Modification in Patients With Diabetes: Rationale and Design of the VOLTAIRE Study.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Association of cardiovascular risk scores with coronary plaque and its progression among individuals with family history of coronary artery disease.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Genomic and Precision Medicine Approaches in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: From Risk Prediction to Therapy-A Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Review
- Severe multivessel coronary heart disease in a young woman with familial hypercholesterolemia and congenital heart disease: A case report.Case reports in women's health · 2024Article
- Transforming the cardiometabolic disease landscape: Multimodal AI-powered approaches in prevention and management.Cell metabolism · 2024Review
- DAG1 haploinsufficiency is associated with sporadic and familial isolated or pauci-symptomatic hyperCKemia.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Article
- Medicine 2032: The future of cardiovascular disease prevention with machine learning and digital health technology.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2022Review
- Etiologic Puzzle of Coronary Artery Disease: How Important Is Genetic Component?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Incomplete Penetrance and Variable Expressivity: From Clinical Studies to Population Cohorts.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of the reviewCoronary artery disease (CAD) is a common disease globally attributable to the interplay of complex genetic and lifestyle factors. Here, we review how genomic sequencing advances have broadened the fundamental understanding of the monogenic and polygenic contributions to CAD and how these insights can be utilized, in part by creating polygenic risk estimates, for improved disease risk stratification at the individual patient level. RECENT
findingsInitial studies linking premature CAD with rare familial cases of elevated blood lipids highlighted high-risk monogenic contributions, predominantly presenting as familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). More commonly CAD genetic risk is a function of multiple, higher frequency variants each imparting lower magnitude of risk, which can be combined to form polygenic risk scores (PRS) conveying significant risk to individuals at the extremes. However, gaps remain in clinical validation of PRSs, most notably in non-European populations. With improved and more broadly utilized genomic sequencing technologies, the genetic underpinnings of coronary artery disease are being unraveled. As a result, polygenic risk estimation is poised to become a widely used and powerful tool in the clinical setting. While the use of PRSs to augment current clinical risk stratification for optimization of cardiovascular disease risk by lifestyle change or therapeutic targeting is promising, we await adequately powered, prospective studies, demonstrating the clinical utility of polygenic risk estimation in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.