Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196807›Full record

ReviewHandbook of experimental pharmacology2021

Experimental Methods for Investigating Uptake 2 Processes In Vivo.

Anna Marie Buchanan, Brenna Parke, Parastoo Hashemi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna Marie Buchanan *Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Brenna Parke *Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Parastoo HashemiDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. phashemi@imperial.ac.uk.
University of South Carolina · USImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromodulators are critical regulators of the brain's signaling processes, and thus they are popular pharmacological targets for psychoactive therapies. It is clear that monoamine uptake mechanisms are complicated and subject to multiple uptake mechanisms. Uptake 1 describes uptake of the monoamine via its designated transporter (SERT for serotonin, NET for norepinephrine, and DAT for dopamine), whereas Uptake 2 details multiple transporter types on neurons and glia taking up different types of modulators, not necessarily specific to the monoamine. While Uptake 1 processes have been well-studied over the past few decades, Uptake 2 mechanisms have remained more difficult to study because of the limitations in methods that have the sensitivity and spatiotemporal resolution to look at the subtleties in uptake profiles. In this chapter we review the different experimental approaches that have yielded important information about Uptake 2 mechanisms in vivo. The techniques (scintillation microspectrophotometry, microdialysis, chronoamperometry, and voltammetry) are described in detail, and pivotal studies associated with each method are highlighted. It is clear from these reviewed works that Uptake 2 processes are critical to consider to advance our understanding of the brain and develop effective neuropsychiatric therapies.

Indexed as

Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsNorepinephrine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsBiological TransportDopamineHumansSerotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsDopamineDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsNorepinephrine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsSerotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsElectrochemistryIn vivoMethodsNeurochemistryUptake 2

Identifiers

PMID34196807
OpenAlexW3173770662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.