ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021
Use of residual neural network for the detection of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament on plain cervical radiography.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning for identifying cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Performance and clinical implications of machine learning models for detecting cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
- Development of artificial intelligence for automated measurement of cervical lordosis on lateral radiographs.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) causes serious problems, such as myelopathy and acute spinal cord injury. The early and accurate diagnosis of OPLL would hence prevent the miserable prognoses. Plain lateral radiography is an essential method for the evaluation of OPLL. Therefore, minimizing the diagnostic errors of OPLL on radiography is crucial. Image identification based on a residual neural network (RNN) has been recognized to be potentially effective as a diagnostic strategy for orthopedic diseases; however, the accuracy of detecting OPLL using RNN has remained unclear. An RNN was trained with plain lateral cervical radiography images of 2,318 images from 672 patients (535 images from 304 patients with OPLL and 1,773 images from 368 patients of Negative). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, and false negative rate of diagnosis of the RNN were calculated. The mean accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, and false negative rate of the model were 98.9%, 97.0%, 99.4%, 2.2%, and 1.0%, respectively. The model achieved an overall area under the curve of 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.00) in which AUC in each fold estimated was 0.99, 0.99, 0.98, 0.98, and 0.99, respectively. An algorithm trained by an RNN could make binary classification of OPLL on cervical lateral X-ray images. RNN may hence be useful as a screening tool to assist physicians in identifying patients with OPLL in future setting. To achieve accurate identification of OPLL patients clinically, RNN has to be trained with other cause of myelopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.