Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196801›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the graded chronic pain scale in patients with chronic low back pain.

Fatih Özden, Mehmet Özkeskin, Serkan Bakırhan, Özgür Nadiye Karaman, Hüseyin Aydoğmuş

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fatih ÖzdenKöyceğiz Vocational School of Health Services, Elderly Care Department, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey. fatihozden@mu.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0001-6593-3758
Mehmet ÖzkeskinFaculty of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
Serkan BakırhanFaculty of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
Özgür Nadiye KaramanPhysical Therapy Unit, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Training and Research Hospital, Muğla, Turkey.
Hüseyin AydoğmuşFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo translate and cross-culturally adapt the Turkish version of the Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised (GCPS-R) and to evaluate its reliability and validity.

methodsThe prospective and cross-sectional study was performed with 102 low back pain patients (67 women, 35 men). Patients were asked to complete the GCPS-R twice, one week apart. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Short Form-36 (SF-36), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) were filled only in the first evaluation. Test-retest reliability was analyzed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's α. The minimal detectable change (MDC

resultsThe mean age of the patients was 45.2 ± 13.1 years. The internal consistency was acceptable, and test-retest reliability was excellent (α = 0.933, ICC = 0.972). SEM

conclusionThe Turkish version of GCPS-R is a valid and reliable questionnaire in patients with chronic low back pain. Level of Evidence II (Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding).

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainAdultCross-Cultural ComparisonCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesGraded chronic pain scaleLow back painReliabilityTurkish versionValidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.