Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196792›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2022

Multiple, random spot urine sampling for estimating urinary sodium excretion.

Gianluigi Ardissino, Antonio Vergori, Cesare Vergori, Laura Martelli, Valeria Daccò, Maria Cristina Villa, Martino Masciani, Alice Monzani, Patrizia Salice, Silvia Ghiglia and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Gianluigi ArdissinoPediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Antonio VergoriPaediatric Department, Ospedale Maggiore, Lodi, Italy. antonio.vergori@gmail.com.
Cesare VergoriAltran Italia SpA, Turin, Italy.
Laura MartelliPaediatric Department, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Valeria DaccòNeonatology Unit, Ospedale San Giuseppe, Milan, Italy.
Maria Cristina VillaPediatric Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Martino MascianiPediatric and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Ospedale Bufalini, Cesena, Italy.
Alice MonzaniHealth Science Department, Pediatric Department, Università del Piemonte Orientale, AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.
Patrizia SalicePediatric Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Silvia GhigliaPediatric Cardiology Unit, Vittore Buzzi Children's Hospital, ASST FBF-Sacco, Milan, Italy.
Michela PerroneNICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Valentina CaponePediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Maria Cristina MancusoPediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Antenore GiussaniKidney Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni Raimondo PieriPediatric and Pediatric Emergency Unit, AO SS Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Annalisa BoscoPediatric Department, Ospedale F. del Ponte, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Marta BrambillaPediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Roberto RomanoPediatric Department, University of Milano, Milan, Italy.
Stefania RotondoPediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Roberto Buzzetti, Bergamo, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITAltran (Italy) · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo · ITOspedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi · ITOspedale Maggiore · ITOspedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITOspedale San Giuseppe · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The measurement of sodium intake may be important for the management of hypertension. Dietary surveys and 24-h urinary collection are often unreliable and/or impractical. We hypothesized that urinary sodium excretion can be accurately estimated through multiple spot urine samples from different days. All enrolled subjects were children of the coauthors of the study. Fifty-two 24-h urinary collections (4 per subject) for measuring sodium excretion and the 297 related urinary samples (1 per voiding) were collected for calculating the urinary sodium/urinary creatinine ratio in 13 children. The mean of 4 measured sodium excretions served as the individual "gold standard". Twenty-four urinary collections were used to generate the equation predicting the mean measured sodium excretion from the mean of 4 urinary sodium/urinary creatinine [= 0.016 × urinary sodium (mmol/L) / urinary creatinine (mmol/L) ratio + 3.3)]; the remaining 28 urinary collections and 153 urinary samples were used for the external validation. All subjects underwent an additional validation procedure involving 12 urinary samples randomly collected on different days 6 months apart. The performance of sodium excretion calculated from a total of over 22,000 possible means of 4 out of all the available urinary samples, randomly taken on different days, was analyzed as to precision (by means of the coefficient of variation) and as to accuracy (by means of the P30). The coefficients of variations of measured vs. calculated sodium excretion were 25.3% vs. 25.8%, and the P30 of calculated sodium excretion was 100%. The excellent performance of calculated sodium excretion was confirmed both by external validation and by samples collected 6 months apart with mean P30s, all between 86 and 100%.Conclusion: In the described experimental conditions, urinary sodium excretion was estimated with equal precision and more accurately (and practically) by the mean of 4 urinary sodium/urinary creatinine ratios from random samples from different days than by a single urinary collection. In real life, with several errors systematically affecting urinary collection, the superiority of calculated sodium excretion is likely to be even greater. What is Known: • The measurement of sodium intake with the current standards of care (dietary survey or 24-h urinary collection) is laborious and can be inaccurate. What is New: • The study provides evidence that sodium intake can be estimated equally precisely, more accurately and more practically with the urinary sodium-to-urinary creatinine ratio from 4 urine samples taken on different days than with a single urinary collection.

Indexed as

HypertensionSodium, DietaryChildCreatinineDietHumansSodiumUrinalysisUrine Specimen CollectionCreatinineSodiumSodium, DietaryHypertensionSodium excretionSpot urine

Identifiers

PMID34196792
OpenAlexW3173901373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.