Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196753›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2021

Validation of the in vitro comet assay for DNA cross-links and altered bases detection.

Damián Muruzabal, Julen Sanz-Serrano, Sylvie Sauvaigo, Bertrand Treillard, Ann-Karin Olsen, Adela López de Cerain, Ariane Vettorazzi, Amaya Azqueta

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Application of the Comet Assay in Advanced In Vitro Models.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Modified Alkaline Comet Assay to Detect Oxidative DNA Damage.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Damián MuruzabalDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31009, Pamplona, Spain.
Julen Sanz-SerranoDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31009, Pamplona, Spain.
Sylvie SauvaigoLXRepair, Biopolis, 5 Avenue du Grand Sablon, 38700, La Tronche, France.
Bertrand TreillardLXRepair, Biopolis, 5 Avenue du Grand Sablon, 38700, La Tronche, France.
Ann-Karin OlsenSection of Molecular Toxicology, Department of Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Skøyen, PO Box 222, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Adela López de CerainDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31009, Pamplona, Spain.
Ariane VettorazziDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31009, Pamplona, Spain. avettora@unav.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9182-8417
Amaya AzquetaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31009, Pamplona, Spain.
Navarre Institute of Health Research · ESLaboratoire de Radiopharmaceutiques Biocliniques · FRUniversidad de Navarra · ESNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

European Cooperation in Science and Technology COST Action, CA 15132Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades AGL-70640-RRamón y Cajal RYC-2013-14370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanistic toxicology is gaining weight for human health risk assessment. Different mechanistic assays are available, such as the comet assay, which detects DNA damage at the level of individual cells. However, the conventional alkaline version only detects strand breaks and alkali-labile sites. We have validated two modifications of the in vitro assay to generate mechanistic information: (1) use of DNA-repair enzymes (i.e., formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase, endonuclease III, human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase I and human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase) for detection of oxidized and alkylated bases as well as (2) a modification for detecting cross-links. Seven genotoxicants with different mechanisms of action (potassium bromate, methyl methanesulfonate, ethyl methanesulfonate, hydrogen peroxide, cisplatin, mitomycin C, and benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide), as well as a non-genotoxic compound (dimethyl sulfoxide) and a cytotoxic compound (Triton X-100) were tested on TK-6 cells. We were able to detect with high sensitivity and clearly differentiate oxidizing, alkylating and cross-linking agents. These modifications of the comet assay significantly increase its sensitivity and its specificity towards DNA lesions, providing mechanistic information regarding the type of damage.

Indexed as

AlkylationCell LineComet AssayDNA DamageDNA Repair EnzymesHumansMutagensOxidation-ReductionSensitivity and SpecificityDNA Repair EnzymesMutagensAlkylated basesComet assayCross-linksIn vitroMechanism of actionOxidized bases

Identifiers

PMID34196753
PMCPMC8298235
OpenAlexW3176466657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.