ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2021
[Diagnostics of benign and malignant tumors of the orbit].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological features of cranial-nasal-orbital communicating lesions and diagnostic indicators for differentiating benign and malignant neoplasms.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- [Orbital tumors : Diseases with a maximum challenge for interdisciplinary diagnostics, treatment and aftercare].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Article
- [Pterygium: what about point of care biomarkers?]Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrbital space-occupying lesions can have a significant impact on the quality of life. Depending on the dignity and etiology of the mass, they can even represent a life-threatening process, which must be timely treated in an interdisciplinary cooperation.
objectiveTo achieve a comprehensive overview about the diagnostics and frequency of malignant and benign masses of the orbit. MATERIAL AND
methodsA literature search was carried out in PubMed and Google scholar. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Clinically, orbital lesions can show symptoms, such as exophthalmos with an increase in the vertical lid fissure, visual impairment and motility dysfunction with diplopia. Depending on the extent, an exposure keratopathy can occur due to failure to close the eyelids. For the diagnostics several tests should be carried out. Following a thorough anamnesis and clinical examination, these should include a blood sample to test for various parameters, an ultrasound examination with subsequent computed tomography (CT) in cases of bone involvement or thin slice magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the orbit for assessment of soft tissues. In adults an endocrine orbitopathy is the most frequent cause of an inflammatory orbital process, where lymphomas are the most frequent entity among malignant tumors and vascular space-occupying lesions are the most frequent benign tumors. In children the most frequent benign masses are dermoid cysts and rhabdomyosarcoma is the most frequent primary malignant orbital tumor. The multimodal interdisciplinary treatment can include surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy, depending on the entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.