SynthesisJournal of animal science2021
Efficacy of phage therapy in pigs: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Therapeutic potential of a novel virulent bacteriophage XQ-1 against avian pathogenic Escherichia coli infection in broiler chickens.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Impact of phage therapy in post-weaning piglets challenged with ETEC strain in a controlled minitrial.Porcine health management · 2026Article
- Assessing the impact of phage therapy on growth performance, microbiome and phage specific immune response in chickens.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- ThreeViruses · 2026Article
- Bacteriophage therapy beyond antibiotics: emerging innovations for infectious and non-infectious diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Evolutionary Origins and Virulence Determinants of ST25 HypervirulentTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Targeting STEC-induced edema disease in weaned piglets: prophylactic oral phage P-GXEC-L2P5 attenuates bacterial colonization, toxin production, and endothelial damage.Veterinary research · 2025Article
- The Emerging Role of Dietary Bacteriophage in Monogastric Animals in the Post-Antibiotic Era-A Review.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Reduction of Salmonella gallinarum in poultry with phage-based interventions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bacteriophages as Potential Anti-Pathogenic Agents for Intestinal Health of Weaned Piglets in the Post-Antibiotic Era: An Updated Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Temporal transcriptomics uncover dynamic interactions between pathogenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Consumer acceptance of bacteriophage technology for microbial control.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Phage Delivery Strategies for Biocontrolling Human, Animal, and Plant Bacterial Infections: State of the Art.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Effects of supplemental bacteriophage on the gut microbiota and nutrient digestibility of ileal-cannulated pigs.Journal of animal science and technology · 2024Article
- Characterization and genome analysis of a novel phage Kayfunavirus TM1.Virus genes · 2023Article
- Activity of a Bacteriophage Cocktail to ControlPHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Bacteriophages and Food Production: Biocontrol and Bio-Preservation Options for Food Safety.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Invited review: strategic adoption of antibiotic-free pork production: the importance of a holistic approach.Translational animal science · 2022Review
- Prophylactic Delivery of a Bacteriophage Cocktail in Feed Significantly Reduces Salmonella Colonization in Pigs.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Limits on the use and efficacy of various antibiotics coupled with negative consumer perception of the practice have together spurred substantial research into compounds that could reduce the use antibiotics to control bacterial diseases in pigs. Bacteriophages are often among such potential compounds, and various groups have examined the efficacy of bacteriophages or bacteriophage products in limiting transmission or colonization of targeted bacteria. The study presented here provides a systematic review of such studies followed by a meta-analysis of aggregated data produced by each study. The data set was limited to inputs (n = 19; 576 total observations) from studies where: 1) live pigs were inoculated with a known quantity of challenge bacteria; 2) challenged animals were treated with a known quantity of phages; 3) concentrations of the challenge bacteria were measured in different tissues/fluids following phage treatment; and 4) SD (or SE to allow calculation of SD) was reported. Concentrations of challenge bacteria were significantly lower in phage-treated pigs versus challenged but untreated pigs (P < 0.0001; effect size = -1.06 1log10 colony-forming units [CFU]/g). The effect size of phage treatment was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in samples collected 48 to 96 h following phage treatment versus those collected ≤ 24 h following phage treatment. Likewise, effect size of phage treatment was significantly greater in piglets versus market-weight pigs. Across observations, phage treatment effect sizes were greatest (P < 0.01) in fecal samples versus ileal or cecal samples. Taken together, these data indicate that phage treatment can significantly reduce the concentrations of targeted bacteria in pigs; scenarios exist, however, where phage treatment could predictably be more or less effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.