ArticleACR open rheumatology2021
Nutrition Information Resources Used by People With Systemic Sclerosis and Perceived Advantages and Disadvantages: A Nominal Group Technique Study.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generative AI in healthcare: redefining clinical practice through digital transformation.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Development of a tool to map SSc pain sources, characteristics and management experiences: the SPIN Pain Assessment Tool.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Knowledge and perceptions of medical practitioners on the role of nutrition in systemic sclerosis.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2026Article
- Views of nutrition needs in patients with systemic sclerosis.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2024Article
- Protocol for the development of a tool to map systemic sclerosis pain sources, patterns, and management experiences: a Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network patient-researcher partnership.BMC rheumatology · 2024Article
- The use of virtual nominal groups in healthcare research: An extended scoping review.PloS one · 2024Article
- A survey of Australian rheumatologists' perspectives of nutrition needs in systemic sclerosis.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2023Article
- Current Perspectives on Periodontitis in Systemic Sclerosis: Associative Relationships, Pathogenic Links, and Best Practices.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Diet in Scleroderma: Is There a Need for Intervention?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Synthesis and Evaluation of the Effects of Nanoparticles of Atorvastatin and Atorvastatin on Cuprizone-Induced Demyelination: Modulation of the Nrf2/NF-kB Signaling Pathway.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPRArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWhere people with systemic sclerosis (SSc) (or scleroderma) obtain diet and nutrition information to manage their disease is not known. Objectives were to identify 1) resources used by people with SSc for nutrition and diet information and 2) perceived advantages and disadvantages of resources.
methodsWe conducted nominal group technique (NGT) sessions in which people with SSc reported nutrition and diet information resources they have used and perceived advantages and disadvantages of accessing and using resources. Participants indicated whether they had tried each resource. They rated helpfulness and importance of possible advantages and disadvantages. Items elicited across sessions were merged to eliminate overlap.
resultsWe conducted four NGT sessions (three English language, one French language; 15 total participants) and identified 33 unique information resources, 147 resource-specific advantages, and 118 resource-specific disadvantages. Resource categories included health care providers, alternative and complementary practitioners, websites and other media platforms, events, and print materials. The most common themes for advantages and disadvantages included quality and individualization of information and accessibility of resources in terms of cost, location, and comprehensibility. Information provided by medical professionals was regarded as most credible and can be obtained through books, articles, and websites if individual consultation is not easily accessible. Web-based information was considered highly accessible, although of variable credibility. In-person events may be an important source of health information for people with SSc.
conclusionPeople with SSc obtain nutrition and diet information from multiple resources. They seek credible and accessible resources that provide SSc-specific and individualized information.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.