Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196508›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2021

Nutrition Information Resources Used by People With Systemic Sclerosis and Perceived Advantages and Disadvantages: A Nominal Group Technique Study.

Nora Østbø, Elizabeth Y Jimenez, Sami Harb, Angelica Bourgeault, Marie-Eve Carrier, Brett D Thombs, Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Diet and Nutrition Education Patient Advisory Team

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Views of nutrition needs in patients with systemic sclerosis.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Diet in Scleroderma: Is There a Need for Intervention?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nora ØstbøLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Elizabeth Y JimenezCollege of Population Health, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, and Nutrition Research Network, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Chicago, Illinois.
Sami HarbLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Angelica BourgeaultLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Eve CarrierLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Brett D ThombsLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5644-8432
Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Diet and Nutrition Education Patient Advisory Team
Jewish General Hospital · CAUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Arthritis SocietyCanada Research ChairsCIHRLady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General HospitalMcGill UniversityScleroderma Association of BCScleroderma AtlanticScleroderma AustraliaScleroderma CanadaScleroderma ManitobaScleroderma New South WalesScleroderma QueenslandScleroderma SASKScleroderma Society of OntarioScleroderma VictoriaSclérodermie QuébecThe Jewish General Hospital Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhere people with systemic sclerosis (SSc) (or scleroderma) obtain diet and nutrition information to manage their disease is not known. Objectives were to identify 1) resources used by people with SSc for nutrition and diet information and 2) perceived advantages and disadvantages of resources.

methodsWe conducted nominal group technique (NGT) sessions in which people with SSc reported nutrition and diet information resources they have used and perceived advantages and disadvantages of accessing and using resources. Participants indicated whether they had tried each resource. They rated helpfulness and importance of possible advantages and disadvantages. Items elicited across sessions were merged to eliminate overlap.

resultsWe conducted four NGT sessions (three English language, one French language; 15 total participants) and identified 33 unique information resources, 147 resource-specific advantages, and 118 resource-specific disadvantages. Resource categories included health care providers, alternative and complementary practitioners, websites and other media platforms, events, and print materials. The most common themes for advantages and disadvantages included quality and individualization of information and accessibility of resources in terms of cost, location, and comprehensibility. Information provided by medical professionals was regarded as most credible and can be obtained through books, articles, and websites if individual consultation is not easily accessible. Web-based information was considered highly accessible, although of variable credibility. In-person events may be an important source of health information for people with SSc.

conclusionPeople with SSc obtain nutrition and diet information from multiple resources. They seek credible and accessible resources that provide SSc-specific and individualized information.

Identifiers

PMID34196508
PMCPMC8363851
OpenAlexW3173993997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.