Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196370›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology ecology2021

The need for environmental surveillance to understand the ecology, epidemiology and impact of Cryptococcus infection in Africa.

Hannah M Edwards, Massimo Cogliati, Geoffrey Kwenda, Matthew C Fisher

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The emergence of neuroinvasiveFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A Landscape of the Genomic Structure ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Central Nervous System Cryptococcosis due toCurrent tropical medicine reports · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hannah M EdwardsMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8706-0732
Massimo CogliatiDip. Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Pascal 36, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Geoffrey KwendaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, Ridgeway Campus, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia.
Matthew C FisherMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1862-6402
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Zambia · ZM

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K000373/1Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the pathogenic yeasts Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii has been greatly enhanced by use of genome sequencing technologies. Found ubiquitously as saprotrophs in the environment, inhalation of infectious spores from these pathogens can lead to the disease cryptococcosis. Individuals with compromised immune systems are at particular risk, most notably those living with HIV/AIDS. Genome sequencing in combination with laboratory and clinical studies has revealed diverse lineages with important differences in their observed frequency, virulence and clinical outcomes. However, to date, genomic analyses have focused primarily on clinical isolates that represent only a subset of the diversity in the environment. Enhanced genomic surveillance of these yeasts in their native environments is needed in order to understand their ecology, biology and evolution and how these influence the epidemiology and pathophysiology of clinical disease. This is particularly relevant on the African continent from where global cryptococcal diversity may have originated, yet where environmental sampling and sequencing has been sparse despite harbouring the largest population at risk from cryptococcosis. Here, we review what scientifically and clinically relevant insights have been provided by analysis of environmental Cryptococcus isolates to date and argue that with further sampling, particularly in Africa, many more important discoveries await.

Indexed as

CryptococcosisCryptococcus gattiiCryptococcus neoformansAfricaEnvironmental MonitoringHumansecologyepidemiologyevolutionary biologyfungigenomicsmicrobiology

Identifiers

PMID34196370
PMCPMC8536938
OpenAlexW3174243587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.