Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196310›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2021

Targeting the gut to treat multiple sclerosis.

Laura Ghezzi, Claudia Cantoni, Gabriela V Pinget, Yanjiao Zhou, Laura Piccio

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mechanisms and clinical implications of gut-brain interactions.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Enteric nervous system as a therapeutic target in gastrointestinal disorders.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Immunomodulatory Effects ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Laura GhezziDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Claudia CantoniDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Gabriela V PingetCharles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Yanjiao ZhouDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Laura PiccioDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
The University of Sydney · AUUConn Health · USUniversity of Milan · ITWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Intermittent Fasting-induced Gut Microbiome Modulation of CNS AutoimmunityR01NS102633 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ZHOU, YANJIAO · 2017 to 2022
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut-brain axis (GBA) refers to the complex interactions between the gut microbiota and the nervous, immune, and endocrine systems, together linking brain and gut functions. Perturbations of the GBA have been reported in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), suggesting a possible role in disease pathogenesis and making it a potential therapeutic target. While research in the area is still in its infancy, a number of studies revealed that pwMS are more likely to exhibit altered microbiota, altered levels of short chain fatty acids and secondary bile products, and increased intestinal permeability. However, specific microbes and metabolites identified across studies and cohorts vary greatly. Small clinical and preclinical trials in pwMS and mouse models, in which microbial composition was manipulated through the use of antibiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and probiotic supplements, have provided promising outcomes in preventing CNS inflammation. However, results are not always consistent, and large-scale randomized controlled trials are lacking. Herein, we give an overview of how the GBA could contribute to MS pathogenesis, examine the different approaches tested to modulate the GBA, and discuss how they may impact neuroinflammation and demyelination in the CNS.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsAutoimmunityDisease Models, AnimalDysbiosisEndocrine SystemEnteric Nervous SystemFecal Microbiota TransplantationHumansIntestinal MucosaModels, NeurologicalMultiple SclerosisNeuroimmunomodulationProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID34196310
PMCPMC8245171
OpenAlexW3175324753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.