Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196166›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2022

Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy.

Seth E Karol, Deqing Pei, Colton A Smith, Yiwei Liu, Wenjian Yang, Nancy M Kornegay, John C Panetta, Kristine R Crews, Cheng Cheng, Emily R Finch and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seth E KarolDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Deqing PeiDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Colton A SmithDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Yiwei LiuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Wenjian YangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Nancy M KornegayDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
John C PanettaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Kristine R CrewsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Cheng ChengDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Emily R FinchDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Hiroto InabaDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Monika L MetzgerDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Jeffrey E RubnitzDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Raul C RibeiroDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Tanja A GruberDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jun J YangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
William E EvansDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Sima JehaDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Ching-Hon PuiDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Mary V RellingDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN. mary.relling@stjude.org.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USStanford University · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Gregory Armstrong · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
CPML - Project 3: Genome-wide Studies of Adverse EffectsP50GM115279 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI LOH, MIGNON LEE-CHEUN, RELLING, MARY V · 2015 to 2019
$15.1M
Glucocorticoids in Lymphoblastic LeukemiaR01CA142665 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI RELLING, MARY V · 2010 to 2020
$4.6M
Hypertension Intervention to Reduce Osteonecrosis in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaK08CA250418 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI KAROL, SETH EVAN · 2020 to 2024
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA250418NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142665NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM115279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy dosages are often compromised, but most reports lack data on dosages that are actually delivered. In two consecutive acute lymphoblastic leukemia trials that differed in their asparaginase formulation, native E. coli L-asparaginase in St. Jude Total 15 (T15, n=365) and pegaspargase in Total 16 (T16, n=524), we tallied the dose intensities for all drugs on the low-risk or standard-risk arms, analyzing 504,039 dosing records. The median dose intensity for each drug ranged from 61-100%. Dose intensities for several drugs were more than 10% higher on T15 than on T16: cyclophosphamide (P<0.0001 for the standard- risk arm), cytarabine (P<0.0001 for the standard-risk arm), and mercaptopurine (P<0.0001 for the low-risk arm and P<0.0001 for the standardrisk arm). We attributed the lower dosages on T16 to the higher asparaginase dosages on T16 than on T15 (P<0.0001 for both the low-risk and standard-risk arms), with higher dose-intensity for mercaptopurine in those with anti-asparaginase antibodies than in those without (P=5.62x10-3 for T15 standard risk and P=1.43x10-4 for T16 standard risk). Neutrophil count did not differ between protocols for low-risk patients (P=0.18) and was actually lower for standard-risk patients on T16 than on T15 (P<0.0001) despite lower dosages of most drugs on T16. Patients with low asparaginase dose intensity had higher methotrexate dose intensity with no impact on prognosis. The only dose intensity measure predicting a higher risk of relapse on both studies was higher mercaptopurine dose intensity, but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.03 T15; P=0.07 T16). In these intensive multiagent trials, higher dosages of asparaginase compromised the dosing of other drugs for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, particularly mercaptopurine, but lower chemotherapy dose intensity was not associated with relapse.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytarabineHumansMercaptopurineCytarabineMercaptopurine

Identifiers

PMID34196166
PMCPMC8804576
OpenAlexW3176818993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.