Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196164›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2021

Novel immunotherapies in multiple myeloma - chances and challenges.

Leo Rasche, Ralph Wäsch, Markus Munder, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Marc S Raab

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fitness and frailty in myeloma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leo RascheDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg; Mildred Scheel Early Career Center, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg.
Ralph WäschDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg.
Markus MunderThird Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Research Center for Immunotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz.
Hartmut GoldschmidtDepartment of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg; National Center of Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg and.
Marc S RaabDepartment of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg; CCU Molecular Hematology/Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Marc.Raab@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review article, we summarize the latest data on antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell-engaging antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells in the treatment of multiple myeloma. We discuss the pivotal questions to be addressed as these new immunotherapies become standard agents in the management of multiple myeloma. We also focus on the selection of patients for these therapies and speculate as to how best to individualize treatment approaches. We see these novel immunotherapies as representing a paradigm shift. However, despite the promising preliminary data, many open issues remain to be evaluated in future trials.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificImmunoconjugatesMultiple MyelomaHumansImmunotherapyT-LymphocytesAntibodies, BispecificImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID34196164
PMCPMC8485654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.