Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196108›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2021

Semi-automated background removal limits data loss and normalizes imaging mass cytometry data.

Marieke E Ijsselsteijn, Antonios Somarakis, Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt, Thomas Höllt, Noel F C C de Miranda

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marieke E IjsselsteijnDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8195-736X
Antonios SomarakisDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Boudewijn P F LelieveldtDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Thomas HölltComputer Graphics and Visualization, EEMCS, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
Noel F C C de MirandaDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 852832Leiden university data science research program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) allows the detection of multiple antigens (approximately 40 markers) combined with spatial information, making it a unique tool for the evaluation of complex biological systems. Due to its widespread availability and retained tissue morphology, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are often a material of choice for IMC studies. However, antibody performance and signal to noise ratios can differ considerably between FFPE tissues as a consequence of variations in tissue processing, including fixation. In contrast to batch effects caused by differences in the immunodetection procedure, variations in tissue processing are difficult to control. We investigated the effect of immunodetection-related signal intensity fluctuations on IMC analysis and phenotype identification, in a cohort of 12 colorectal cancer tissues. Furthermore, we explored different normalization strategies and propose a workflow to normalize IMC data by semi-automated background removal, using publicly available tools. This workflow can be directly applied to previously acquired datasets and considerably improves the quality of IMC data, thereby supporting the analysis and comparison of multiple samples.

Indexed as

FormaldehydeImage CytometryAntibodiesBiomarkersDiagnostic ImagingHumansTissue FixationAntibodiesBiomarkersFormaldehydebackground removalCyTOFimaging mass cytometrymultiplex immunophenotyping

Identifiers

PMID34196108
PMCPMC9542015
OpenAlexW3175913303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.