Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196098›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2021

Utilization of CBCT to improve the delivery accuracy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery with G-frame.

Lindsey Claps, Damien Mathew, Kathryn Dusenbery, Margaret Reynolds, Yoichi Watanabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lindsey ClapsDepartment of Medical Physics, MSKCC, New York Ctiy, NY, USA.
Damien MathewDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5719-7359
Kathryn DusenberyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Margaret ReynoldsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Yoichi WatanabeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8086-6442

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo quantify the G-frame based stereotactic coordinate definition accuracy of Leksell coordinate G-frame-based Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) by the on-board cone-beam CT (CBCT) and establish remedial action rules to minimize the delivery errors.

methodsWe analyzed the data of 108 patients (a total of 201 tumors) treated by GKRS with G-frame for head fixation. After co-registering the CBCT images and plan reference images, the Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) treatment planning system provided the amount of geometric translation and rotation required to minimize the position difference between the plan and treatment. The software also calculated maximum displacement, which characterizes the position shift more clearly. We studied how much these predicted dosimetric quantities changed if the treatment was delivered without correcting the patient's position.

resultsThe maximum displacement of the patient position obtained from the co-registration of CBCT and plan reference images was 0.81 ± 0.38 mm (0.24-2.03 mm). The target coverage decreased by 3.3 ± 7.0% on average (-48.5% to +35.7%). The decrease of the target coverage, however, became smaller as the target volume increased. In particular, if the volume was greater than 2 cm

conclusionsThe position differences reported by the registration module of LGP were within the accuracy limit of image registration for most clinical cases, but the errors could be larger in some cases. Therefore, we propose the following decision process. We do not advise position adjustment for G-frame based GKRS if the maximum displacement is less than 1 mm. When this limit is exceeded, however, another criterion should be applied to the decision making by considering the tumor size (or the treatment volume) together with the acceptable change of the tumor coverage.

Indexed as

RadiosurgerySpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyCone-Beam Computed TomographyHeadHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalCBCTcoordinate definition accuracyGamma Knife ICONG-frame

Identifiers

PMID34196098
PMCPMC8364265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.