Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34195951›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2022

Wearable cardioverter-defibrillators after myocardial infarction: a review of its clinical utility and unmet needs in current clinical practice.

Hirofumi Hioki, Ken Kozuma, Yoshio Kobayashi, Kenji Ando, Yoshihiro Morino, Jun Kishihara, Junya Ako, Yuji Ikari

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Wearable biosensors for human fatigue diagnosis: A review.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hirofumi HiokiDivision of Cardiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan.
Ken KozumaDivision of Cardiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan. kozumak@med.teikyo-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3977-5973
Yoshio KobayashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Kenji AndoDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Yoshihiro MorinoDepartment of Cardiology, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Morioka, Japan.
Jun KishiharaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Junya AkoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Yuji IkariDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Kitasato University · JPTeikyo University · JPChiba University · JPIwate Medical University · JPKokura Memorial Hospital · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death is one of the leading causes of death in the older population. Compared with the general population, patients who experienced a myocardial infarction are four to six times more likely to experience sudden cardiac death. Though primary percutaneous coronary intervention considerably reduces mortality in patients who experienced a myocardial infarction, a non-negligible number of sudden cardiac deaths still occurs. Despite the high incidence rate of sudden cardiac deaths during the first month after myocardial infarction, prophylactic use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators has so far failed to convey a survival benefit. Therefore, current clinical guidelines recommend that cardioverter-defibrillator implantation is contraindicated until 90 days after myocardial infarction. Wearable cardioverter-defibrillators were first approved for clinical use in 2002 and are currently considered as a bridge to therapy in patients with myocardial infarction with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in whom cardioverter-defibrillator implantation is temporarily not indicated. However, there is insufficient recognition among interventional cardiologists of the use of wearable cardioverter-defibrillators for preventing sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction. Hence, we reviewed the evidence of the efficacy of wearable cardioverter-defibrillators used in patients following myocardial infarction to achieve better management of sudden cardiac death.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableMyocardial InfarctionWearable Electronic DevicesDeath, Sudden, CardiacHumansStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftLeft ventricular dysfunctionMyocardial infarctionPrognosisSudden cardiac deathWearable cardioverter-defibrillator

Identifiers

PMID34195951
PMCPMC8789717
OpenAlexW3175865639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.