ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
The impact of carbon market pilots on air pollution: evidence from China.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Pollution and Carbon Reduction in the Yellow River Basin, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Can power market reform reduce air pollution?--Evidence from prefecture-level cities in China.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As China's economic development enters a transitional stage, the government has put forward higher requirements for efficient air pollution control. Different from the traditional environmental regulation methods, China's carbon market pilots (CMP) can use market mechanism to achieve carbon emission reduction policy goals while also providing more efficient control methods for air pollution. Using the unique daily air pollution data of 324 prefecture-level and above cities in China from December 1, 2013, to December 18, 2017, and matching them with the daily data of carbon allowance trading in each CMP, we employ the time-varying difference-in-differences (DID) method to explore the casual relationship between CMP and air pollution, and its influence mechanism. Our results show that (1) the establishment of CMP can reduce air pollution by at least 4.9%, especially on sulfur dioxide, inhalable particulate matter, fine particles, and carbon monoxide. This conclusion is still robust after we use the instrumental variable (IV) method to deal with endogeneity. (2) Mechanism analysis shows that the reducing effect of CMP on air pollution is achieved mainly through three channels, including energy consumption reducing, technological progressing, and industrial structure upgrading. (3) Since CMP have just been established, government regulation plays a stronger role than the market mechanism in the process of CMP affecting air pollution. However, with the continuous improvement of CMP, the market mechanism has also played an increasingly important dynamic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.