ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021
Intra-saccular device modeling for treatment planning of intracranial aneurysms: from morphology to hemodynamics.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of pre-treatment aneurysm angulation. What happens with WEB devices at follow-up?Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
- Computer Aided Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Based on 2D/3D Mapping, Virtual Deployment and Online Distal Marker Detection.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Article
- Proximal Clipping and Distal High-Flow Bypass in the Treatment of Giant/Complex Intracranial Aneurysm: An Opportunity or a Risk from a Fluid-Structural Interaction Analysis.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationIntra-saccular devices (ID), developed for the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms, offer new alternatives for treating complex terminal and bifurcation aneurysms. In this work, a complete workflow going from medical images to post-treatment CFD analysis is described and used in the assessment of a concrete clinical problem. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo different intra-saccular device sizes were virtually implanted in 3D models of the patient vasculature using the ID-Fit method. After deployment, the local porosity at the closed end of the device in contact with the blood flow was computed. This porosity was then used to produce a CFD porous medium model of the device. Velocities and wall shear stress were assessed for each model.
resultsSix patients treated with intra-saccular devices were included in this work. For each case, 2 different device sizes were virtually implanted and 3 CFD simulations were performed: after deployment simulation with each size and before deployment simulation (untreated). A visible reduction in velocities was observed after device implantation. Velocity and WSS reduction was statistically significant (K-S statistics, [Formula: see text]).
conclusionsPlacement of different device size can lead to a partial filling of the aneurysm, either at the dome or at the neck, depending on the particular positioning by the interventionist. The methodology used in this work can have a strong clinical impact, since it provides additional information in the process of device selection using preoperative data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.