ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2021
High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Clinical Review.
Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parotid Metastases from Head-Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prognostic Stratification.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- [Long-term outcomes of maxillectomy for paranasal sinus cancer].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Observational
- Review
- Molecular and Histopathological Characterization of Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Case-Control Study.Cancers · 2024Article
- Article
- Neck management in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist: a promising cytokine against human squamous cell carcinomas.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Significant Biomarkers Identification Associated with Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Signatures of EMT, immunosuppression, and inflammation in primary and recurrent human cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma at single-cell resolution.Theranostics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven the rapidly evolving nature of the field, the current state of "high-risk" head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) is poorly characterized.
methodsNarrative review of the epidemiology, diagnosis, workup, risk stratification, staging and treatment of high-risk HNcSCC.
resultsClinical and pathologic risk factors for adverse HNcSCC outcomes are nuanced (e.g., immunosuppression and perineural invasion). Frequent changes in adverse prognosticators have outpaced population-based registries and the variables they track, restricting our understanding of the epidemiology of HNcSCC and inhibiting control of the disease. Current heterogeneous staging and risk stratification systems are largely derived from institutional data, compromising their external validity. In the absence of staging system consensus, tumor designations such as "high risk" and "advanced" are variably used and insufficiently precise to guide management. Evidence guiding treatment of high-risk HNcSCC with curative intent is also suboptimal. For patients with incurable disease, an array of trials are evaluating the impact of immunotherapy, targeted biologic therapy, and other novel agents.
conclusionPopulation-based registries that broadly track updated, nuanced, adverse clinicopathologic risk factors, and outcomes are needed to guide development of improved staging systems. Design and development of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in advanced-stage HNcSCC populations are needed to evaluate (1) observation, sentinel lymph node biopsy, or elective neck dissection for management of the cN0 neck, (2) indications for surgery plus adjuvant radiation versus adjuvant chemoradiation, and (3) the role of immunotherapy in treatment with curative intent. Considering these knowledge gaps, the authors explore a potential high-risk HNcSCC treatment framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.