Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34195900›Full record

ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2021

High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Clinical Review.

Flora Yan, Brittny N Tillman, Rajiv I Nijhawan, Divya Srivastava, David J Sher, Vladimir Avkshtol, Jade Homsi, Justin A Bishop, Erin M Wynings, Rebecca Lee and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Long-term outcomes of maxillectomy for paranasal sinus cancer].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Flora YanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Brittny N TillmanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Rajiv I NijhawanDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Divya SrivastavaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
David J SherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Vladimir AvkshtolDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jade HomsiHarold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Justin A BishopDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Erin M WyningsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Rebecca LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Larry L MyersDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Andrew T DayDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Andrew.day@utsouthwestern.edu.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the rapidly evolving nature of the field, the current state of "high-risk" head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) is poorly characterized.

methodsNarrative review of the epidemiology, diagnosis, workup, risk stratification, staging and treatment of high-risk HNcSCC.

resultsClinical and pathologic risk factors for adverse HNcSCC outcomes are nuanced (e.g., immunosuppression and perineural invasion). Frequent changes in adverse prognosticators have outpaced population-based registries and the variables they track, restricting our understanding of the epidemiology of HNcSCC and inhibiting control of the disease. Current heterogeneous staging and risk stratification systems are largely derived from institutional data, compromising their external validity. In the absence of staging system consensus, tumor designations such as "high risk" and "advanced" are variably used and insufficiently precise to guide management. Evidence guiding treatment of high-risk HNcSCC with curative intent is also suboptimal. For patients with incurable disease, an array of trials are evaluating the impact of immunotherapy, targeted biologic therapy, and other novel agents.

conclusionPopulation-based registries that broadly track updated, nuanced, adverse clinicopathologic risk factors, and outcomes are needed to guide development of improved staging systems. Design and development of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in advanced-stage HNcSCC populations are needed to evaluate (1) observation, sentinel lymph node biopsy, or elective neck dissection for management of the cN0 neck, (2) indications for surgery plus adjuvant radiation versus adjuvant chemoradiation, and (3) the role of immunotherapy in treatment with curative intent. Considering these knowledge gaps, the authors explore a potential high-risk HNcSCC treatment framework.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsSkin NeoplasmsHumansNeckNeck DissectionNeoplasm StagingSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

Identifiers

PMID34195900
OpenAlexW3177068548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.