Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34195852›Full record

ArticleCalcified tissue international2021

Application of Machine Learning to Identify Clinically Meaningful Risk Group for Osteoporosis in Individuals Under the Recommended Age for Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Hyun Woo Park, Hyojung Jung, Kyoung Yeon Back, Hyeon Ju Choi, Kwang Sun Ryu, Hyo Soung Cha, Eun Kyung Lee, A Ram Hong, Yul Hwangbo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Calcified tissue international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development and reporting of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis management.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyun Woo ParkHealthcare AI Team, National Cancer Center, 323, Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi, 10408, South Korea.
Hyojung JungHealthcare AI Team, National Cancer Center, 323, Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi, 10408, South Korea.
Kyoung Yeon BackHealthcare AI Team, National Cancer Center, 323, Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi, 10408, South Korea.
Hyeon Ju ChoiHealthcare AI Team, National Cancer Center, 323, Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi, 10408, South Korea.
Kwang Sun RyuCancer Big Data Center, National Cancer Center, National Cancer Control Institute, Goyang, South Korea.
Hyo Soung ChaCancer Big Data Center, National Cancer Center, National Cancer Control Institute, Goyang, South Korea.
Eun Kyung LeeCenter for Thyroid Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
A Ram Hong *Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 61469, South Korea. wanilove23@nate.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2494-9902
Yul Hwangbo *Healthcare AI Team, National Cancer Center, 323, Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi, 10408, South Korea. yulhwangbo@ncc.re.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-2133
National Cancer Center · KRChonnam National University · KRNational Cancer Center · US

Funding

National Cancer Center NCC-2010020-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis; it is generally recommended in men ≥ 70 and women ≥ 65 years old. Therefore, assessment of clinical risk factors for osteoporosis is very important in individuals under the recommended age for DXA. Here, we examine the diagnostic performance of machine learning-based prediction models for osteoporosis in individuals under the recommended age for DXA examination. Data of 2210 men aged 50-69 and 1099 women aged 50-64 obtained from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey IV-V were analyzed. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was used to find relevant clinical features and applied to three machine learning models: XGBoost, logistic regression, and a multilayer perceptron. For the prediction of osteoporosis, the XGBoost model using the top 20 features extracted from XGBoost showed the most reliable performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.73 and 0.79 in men and women, respectively. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of the Shapley additive explanation values based on a risk-score model obtained from XGBoost and conventional osteoporosis risk assessment tools for prediction of osteoporosis using optimal cut-off values for each model. We observed that a cut-off risk score of ≥ 28 in men and ≥ 47 in women was optimal to classify a positive screening for osteoporosis (an AUROC of 0.86 in men and 0.91 in women). The XGBoost-based osteoporosis-prediction model outperformed conventional risk assessment tools. Therefore, machine learning-based prediction models are a more suitable option than conventional risk assessment methods for screening osteoporosis in individuals under the recommended age for DXA examination.

Indexed as

Bone DensityOsteoporosisAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleNutrition SurveysRisk FactorsBone mineral densityDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryMachine learningOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID34195852
OpenAlexW3176433021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.