Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34195644›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2021

Favorable Reoperation Rate at 2 Years Following Repair of Horizontal Cleavage Tears Using an All Suture-Based Technique: A Prospective, Multicenter Trial.

Peter Kurzweil, Aaron J Krych, Adam Anz, F Winston Gwathmey, Gregory Loren, Matthew Lavery, David C Flanigan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Management of Horizontal Cleavage Meniscus Tears.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Peter KurzweilMemorial Orthopaedic Surgical Group, Long Beach, California, U.S.A.
Aaron J KrychMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Adam AnzAndrews Institute for Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, Gulf Breeze, Florida, U.S.A.
F Winston GwathmeyUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S.A.
Gregory LorenCORE Orthopaedic Medical Center, Encinitas, California, U.S.A.
Matthew LaveryOrthoIndy, Greenwood, Indiana, U.S.A.
David C FlaniganThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Jameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
Andrews Institute for Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine · USFreedom to Live · USIndiana Orthopaedic Hospital · USMayo Clinic · USMemorial Orthopaedic Surgical Group · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis prospective, multicenter trial evaluates the clinical success (as measured by reoperation rates and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures) of using circumferential compression stitches with all-suture techniques for horizontal cleavage tears (HCTs) of the meniscus.

methodsInvestigators enrolled 30 patients (mean age, 38.2 years; standard deviation, 11.1 years) aged 18 to 60 years with HCTs in the symptomatic compartment at 8 centers in the United States who underwent HCT repair with all-suture circumferential stitches using a self-retrieving all-inside suture passing device. Postoperative follow-up visits were conducted at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Study outcomes included freedom from reoperation of the index meniscus repair site; knee pain and function, as measured by International Knee Documentation Committee Knee evaluation (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm Knee Scale, and Tegner Activity Scale; and serious complications observed during the study. Minimal clinically important difference at 1 year was assessed for IKDC and Lysholm.

resultsTwenty-three patients had 2-year follow-up data available. Freedom from reoperation was 96.0% at 6 months (26/27, 91.7% at 1 year [23/25], and 82.6% at 2 years [19/23]). Significant improvement was observed in over baseline at 2 years for IKDC (36.7-82.5;

conclusionsRepair of HCTs using all-suture circumferential stitches placed with a self-retrieving all-inside suture passing device leads to a favorable reoperation rate (17.4%), significant improvements in clinical outcomes, and an acceptable rate of serious complications (6.7%) at 2 years, supporting the viability of this treatment approach in this indication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Identifiers

PMID34195644
PMCPMC8220607
OpenAlexW3137544434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.