ArticleHawai'i journal of health & social welfare2021
Utility of Routine Testing for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in the Setting of Preterm Delivery or Premature Preterm Rupture of Membranes.
Article in Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Estimating the individual singleton preterm birth risk: nomogram establishment and independent validation.Translational pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the rates of positive and negative Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae test results in patients screened for these infections and later experienced preterm delivery or preterm premature rupture of membranes. The team conducted a retrospective chart review of patients admitted for preterm premature rupture of membranes or who experienced preterm delivery between April 1, 2009, and April 30, 2015. Patients lacking chlamydia and gonorrhea screening before admission were excluded from the study. Four hundred and six patients met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of chlamydia infection at initial prenatal screening before admission was 13.3%. Among those for whom the prenatal chlamydia test was negative, 1.7% of patients had a positive subsequent chlamydia test on admission screening. Among those for whom the prenatal chlamydia test was positive, 18.5% had a positive subsequent chlamydia test on admission screening. Positive prenatal test (P=.002) and age 25 years or less (P<.001) were associated with positive admission screening for chlamydia, though only a positive prenatal test remained significant in a logistic regression model (odds ratio, 8.56; 95% CI, 2.67-27.49; P=.003). The prevalence of gonorrhea was low at 0.2% of patients positive for gonorrhea at prenatal testing and 0.5% of patients positive for gonorrhea at admission testing. Our results suggest that individualization based on patient characteristics may be utilized to decrease re-testing. More research is needed to identify possible additional risk factors for new infection or re-infection and the most optimal timing for re-screening during the prenatal period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34195620PMC8237327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.