Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34195600›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2021

Evaluation and validation of next-generation sequencing to support lot release for a novel type 2 oral poliovirus vaccine.

John O Konz, Tim Schofield, Sarah Carlyle, Rahnuma Wahid, Azeem Ansari, Jeroen R P M Strating, Ming Te Yeh, Hasmik Manukyan, Saskia L Smits, Erman Tritama and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

John O KonzCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, WA, United States.
Tim SchofieldCMC Sciences, LLC, Germantown, MD 20876, United States.
Sarah CarlyleNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Rahnuma WahidCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, WA, United States.
Azeem AnsariCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jeroen R P M StratingViroclinics Biosciences B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ming Te YehUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Hasmik ManukyanCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Saskia L SmitsViroclinics Biosciences B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erman TritamaP.T. Bio Farma, Bandung, Indonesia.
Latri RahmahP.T. Bio Farma, Bandung, Indonesia.
Dori UgiyadiP.T. Bio Farma, Bandung, Indonesia.
Raul AndinoUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Majid LaassriCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Konstantin ChumakovCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Andrew MacadamNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel, genetically-stabilized type 2 oral polio vaccine (nOPV2), developed to assist in the global polio eradication program, was recently the first-ever vaccine granted Emergency Use Listing by the WHO. Lot release tests for this vaccine included-for the first time to our knowledge-the assessment of genetic heterogeneity using next-generation sequencing (NGS). NGS ensures that the genetically-modified regions of the vaccine virus genome remain as designed and that levels of polymorphisms which may impact safety or efficacy are controlled during routine production. The variants present in nOPV2 lots were first assessed for temperature sensitivity and neurovirulence using molecular clones to inform which polymorphisms warranted formal evaluation during lot release. The novel use of NGS as a lot release test required formal validation of the method. Analysis of an nOPV2 lot spiked with the parental Sabin-2 strain enabled performance characteristics of the method to be assessed simultaneously at over 40 positions in the genome. These characteristics included repeatability and intermediate precision of polymorphism measurement, linearity of both spike-induced and nOPV2 lot-specific polymorphisms, and the limit-of-detection of spike-induced polymorphisms. The performance characteristics of the method met pre-defined criteria for 34 spike-induced polymorphic sites and 8 polymorphisms associated with the nOPV2 preparation; these sites collectively spanned most of the viral genome. Finally, the co-location of variants of interest on genomes was evaluated, with implications for the interpretation of NGS discussed.

Indexed as

cVDPV, circulating vaccine-derived poliovirusGCV, Geometric coefficient of variationG: IU, genome to infectious unit ratioNeurovirulenceNext-generation sequencingNGS, next-generation sequencingnOPV2, type 2 novel oral poliovirus vaccineOPVOPV, oral poliovirus vaccinePoliovirusSNP, single-nucleotide polymorphismTNP, tri-nucleotide polymorphismValidation

Identifiers

PMID34195600
PMCPMC8233139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.