Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34195591›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2021

Synthetic biology as driver for the biologization of materials sciences.

O Burgos-Morales, M Gueye, L Lacombe, C Nowak, R Schmachtenberg, M Hörner, C Jerez-Longres, H Mohsenin, H J Wagner, W Weber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review on Advancement of AI in Synthetic Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cross-species microbial genome transfer: a Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Engineered Bacteria-Based Living Materials for Biotherapeutic Applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

O Burgos-MoralesÉcole Supérieure de Biotechnologie de Strasbourg - ESBS, University of Strasbourg, Illkirch, 67412, France.
M GueyeÉcole Supérieure de Biotechnologie de Strasbourg - ESBS, University of Strasbourg, Illkirch, 67412, France.
L LacombeÉcole Supérieure de Biotechnologie de Strasbourg - ESBS, University of Strasbourg, Illkirch, 67412, France.
C NowakÉcole Supérieure de Biotechnologie de Strasbourg - ESBS, University of Strasbourg, Illkirch, 67412, France.
R SchmachtenbergÉcole Supérieure de Biotechnologie de Strasbourg - ESBS, University of Strasbourg, Illkirch, 67412, France.
M HörnerFaculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79104, Germany.
C Jerez-LongresFaculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79104, Germany.
H MohseninFaculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79104, Germany.
H J WagnerFaculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79104, Germany.
W WeberFaculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79104, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Materials in nature have fascinating properties that serve as a continuous source of inspiration for materials scientists. Accordingly, bio-mimetic and bio-inspired approaches have yielded remarkable structural and functional materials for a plethora of applications. Despite these advances, many properties of natural materials remain challenging or yet impossible to incorporate into synthetic materials. Natural materials are produced by living cells, which sense and process environmental cues and conditions by means of signaling and genetic programs, thereby controlling the biosynthesis, remodeling, functionalization, or degradation of the natural material. In this context, synthetic biology offers unique opportunities in materials sciences by providing direct access to the rational engineering of how a cell senses and processes environmental information and translates them into the properties and functions of materials. Here, we identify and review two main directions by which synthetic biology can be harnessed to provide new impulses for the biologization of the materials sciences: first, the engineering of cells to produce precursors for the subsequent synthesis of materials. This includes materials that are otherwise produced from petrochemical resources, but also materials where the bio-produced substances contribute unique properties and functions not existing in traditional materials. Second, engineered living materials that are formed or assembled by cells or in which cells contribute specific functions while remaining an integral part of the living composite material. We finally provide a perspective of future scientific directions of this promising area of research and discuss science policy that would be required to support research and development in this field.

Indexed as

Cell encapsulationEngineered living materialsInteractive materialsMetabolic engineeringNanomaterialsSmart materialsStimulus-responsive materials

Identifiers

PMID34195591
PMCPMC8237365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.