Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34195547›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2021

GRIT: Women in Medicine Leadership Conference Participants' Perceptions of Gender Discrimination, Disparity, and Mitigation.

Courtney E Harris, Stephanie D Clark, Sherry S Chesak, Tejinder K Khalsa, Manisha Salinas, Amy C S Pearson, Amy W Williams, Susan M Moeschler, Anjali Bhagra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Courtney E HarrisDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Stephanie D ClarkDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Sherry S ChesakDepartment of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Tejinder K KhalsaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Manisha SalinasDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Amy C S PearsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Amy W WilliamsDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Susan M MoeschlerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Anjali BhagraDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess demographic characteristics and perceptions of female physicians in attendance at a medical conference for women with content focused on growth, resilience, inspiration, and tenacity to better understand major barriers women in medicine face and to find solutions to these barriers. PATIENTS AND

methodsA Likert survey was administered to female physicians attending the conference (September 20 to 22, 2018). The survey consisted of demographic data and 4 dimensions that are conducive to women's success in academic medicine: equal access, work-life balance, freedom from gender biases, and supportive leadership.

resultsAll of the 228 female physicians surveyed during the conference completed the surveys. There were 70 participants (31.5%) who were in practice for less than 10 years (early career), 111 (50%) who were in practice for 11 to 20 years (midcareer), and 41 (18.5%) who had more than 20 years of practice (late career). Whereas participants reported positive support from their supervisors (mean, 0.4 [SD 0.9];

conclusionFemale physicians were less likely to feel support for work-life balance and did not report freedom from gender bias in comparison to other dimensions of support. Whereas there was no statistically significant difference between career stage, trends noting that late-career physicians felt less support in all dimensions were observed. Future research should explore a more diverse sample population of women physicians.

Indexed as

CCWAS, culture conducive to women’s academic successCME, continuing medical educationGRIT, growth, resilience, inspiration, and tenacity

Identifiers

PMID34195547
PMCPMC8240154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.