Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34195450›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2021

Examining variable selection methods for the predictive performance of regression models and the proportion of selected variables and selected random variables.

Hiromasa Kaneko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hiromasa KanekoDepartment of Applied Chemistry, School of Science and Technology, Meiji University, 1-1-1 Higashi-Mita, Tama-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 214-8571, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection of a descriptor, X, is crucial for improving the interpretation and prediction accuracy of a regression model. In this study, the prediction accuracy of models constructed using the selected X was determined and the results of variable selection, according to the number of selected X and number of selected variables that are unrelated to an objective variable, such as activities and properties (y), were investigated to evaluate the variable or feature selection methods. Variable selection methods include least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, genetic algorithm-based partial least squares, genetic algorithm-based support vector regression, and Boruta. Several regression analysis methods were used to test the prediction accuracy of the model constructed using the selected X. The characteristics of each variable selection method were analyzed using eight datasets. The results showed that even when variables unrelated to y were selected by variable selection and the number of unrelated variables was the same as the number of the original variables, a regression model with good accuracy, which ignores the influence of such noise variables, can be constructed by applying various regression analysis methods. Additionally, the variables related to y must not to be deleted. These findings provide a basis for improving the variable selection methods.

Indexed as

Feature selectionInterpretabilityPredictive accuracyQSARQSPRRegressionVariable selection

Identifiers

PMID34195450
PMCPMC8237311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.