ArticleHeliyon2021
Examining variable selection methods for the predictive performance of regression models and the proportion of selected variables and selected random variables.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Feature Selection Methods in Machine Learning Models of Cancer Information Seeking Among United States Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Bi-Objective Optimization of Techno-Economic and Environmental Performance for Membrane-Based COMembranes · 2025Article
- Variable selection in mixture cure models using elastic net penalty: application to COVID-19 data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Modified sparse regression to solve heterogeneity and hybrid models for increasing the prediction accuracy of seaweed big data with outliers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predicting the Time-Dependent Toxicities of Binary Mixtures of Five Antibiotics toEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The selection of a descriptor, X, is crucial for improving the interpretation and prediction accuracy of a regression model. In this study, the prediction accuracy of models constructed using the selected X was determined and the results of variable selection, according to the number of selected X and number of selected variables that are unrelated to an objective variable, such as activities and properties (y), were investigated to evaluate the variable or feature selection methods. Variable selection methods include least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, genetic algorithm-based partial least squares, genetic algorithm-based support vector regression, and Boruta. Several regression analysis methods were used to test the prediction accuracy of the model constructed using the selected X. The characteristics of each variable selection method were analyzed using eight datasets. The results showed that even when variables unrelated to y were selected by variable selection and the number of unrelated variables was the same as the number of the original variables, a regression model with good accuracy, which ignores the influence of such noise variables, can be constructed by applying various regression analysis methods. Additionally, the variables related to y must not to be deleted. These findings provide a basis for improving the variable selection methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.